Zoeken in ali sina boek naar fouten

*005 43/6: “But how many were the prophets We (Allah*) sent amongst the people of the
old?” Well, Hadith says 124ooo – and it is not true, because so many had had to leave some
traces.
Besides: With so many different people so many different places in the world – why were
there no other prophet any place in the world at the time of Muhammad – yes, none at all for a
very long time before Muhammad? According to the time scale of Genesis and the Torah and
the Bible that the Quran does not correct, and 124ooo prophets, it should mean hundreds or a
few thousands for each generation.
And: Islam’s explanation for why Allah wanted new holy books on Earth now and then, is
that the world changes, and then some details in the holy book needs adjusting. Why then is
Muhammad said to be the last one? – and the Quran to be the last book, a book that is too
inhuman, too primitive on justice, and too outdated on warfare (too destructive) for modern
societies, just to mention 3 subjects. The world has changed MUCH more between
Muhammad and now, than between Adam and Muhammad, and man needs new instruction
for a less inhuman world – and an omniscient god had known that on beforehand.
*006 43/9a: “- – – ‘Who created the heavens (plural and wrong*)?’ they (non-Muslims*)
would be sure to reply, ‘They were created by (Allah*)”. Wrong – if they believed a god had
created it, they would be sure to mention their own god, though in the old Arabia that may
have been the polytheistic god al-Lah, which could cause (intended?) confusion because the
names were so similar (the same reason why Islam now tends to use the word “God”
instead of “Allah” in the west, we have been told – it hides some of the real differences.)
007 43/9b: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
008 43/9c: “(Allah is*) full of Knowledge – – -”. See 41/12 and 40/75.
*009 43/10a: “(Allah*) has made for you the earth (like a carpet), spread out – – -”. The Quran
many places says the Earth is flat (it always is compared to something flat) – perhaps round
like a disk, but flat – – – like a carpet. Wrong.
*010 43/10b: “- – – and (Allah*) has made for you roads – – -”. We have never heard about a
road made by a god, except perhaps in fairy tales. The paths/roads in Arabia were so old that
no one remembered the start of them, and then Muhammad could tell things like this.
011 43/11a: “- – – We (Allah*) rise to life therewith (with rain*) a land that is dead – – -”. A
land that is coming alive only because of rain is not dead – it is alive with seeds and perhaps
roots.
444
012 43/11b: “- – – We (Allah*) rise to life therewith (with rain*) a land that is dead – – -.”
Wrong. If water is all it takes, the land only looks dead – it is alive with seeds and roots. Any
god knows.
*013 43/11c: “- – – We (Allah*) rise to life therewith (with rain*) a land that is dead; even so
will ye be raised (from the dead) – – -”. The comparison is wrong – and a god had known it. In
the first case the DNA is alive and well and ready to sprout. In a dead body everything is
finished – also the DNA and all its possibility to go against entropy (a term from physics that
can be said to be a measure for chaos and lower states of energy). There is critical difference
in that.
*014 43/12: “- – – (Allah*) created pairs in all things – – -”. Very wrong. This only goes for
multi-cellular beings, and for far from all of them. And it goes not at all for uni-cellular beings
– and they exist in a by far larger number, both in quantity and species. Any god knew this –
Muhammad not.
015 43/14: “And to our Lord (Allah*), surely, must we turn back.” With 2ooo+ mistakes etc.
in the Quran, this may be wrong, too – see 41/10 and 41/12. For sure it is not sure that we
meet Allah – if any god at all – after this life.
016 43/29a: “- – – the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 42/12.
017 43/29b: “- – – a Messenger (Muhammad*) making things clear.” No messenger preaching
what is in the Quran, makes things clear – too many mistakes and too much unclear logic, etc.
018 43/30: “- – – the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 42/12.
00a 43/43a: “- – – the Revelation – – -.” Is it a revelation? And in case from whom? – not from
an omniscient god (too many mistakes) and neither from a good god (too inhuman, too
dishonest, too bloody). But perhaps from a dark power in disguise? – or from humans? – or
even from himself?
019 43/43b: “- – – the Revelation sent down to thee (Muhammad*) – – -.” The claimed
revelation at least is not sent down by any omniscient god like the Quran wants one to believe
– if at all sent down.
020 43/44: “The (Quran) is indeed the message, for thee and for the people – – -.” Definitely
not – too much is wrong. Or if it after all is a message – from whom?
00b 43/45: “And question thou Our (Allah’s*) messengers whom We sent before thee
(Muhammad*); did We appoint any deity other than (Allah) Most Gracious, to be
worshipped?” Allah or Yahweh for the Biblical ones? (In spite of what the Quran says, it is
not the same god unless the god is schizophrenic – the teachings are fundamentally too
different. Islam tries to explain away – without documentation like normal for Islam – the
differences with claims that the Bible is falsified, but science has long since shown that it is
not true. There may be a limited number of mistakes in that book, too – though much less than
in the Quran – but no falsifications.
021 43/46: “- – – the Worlds – – -“. Once more the 7 non-existing Earths that the Quran tells
about. See 65/12.
445
022 43/55: “- – – We (Allah*) drowned them all (= Pharaoh Ramses II and his people*).” At
least Ramses himself did not drown. He did not die from drowning, and he did not die until
several years later.
**023 43/56: “And We (Allah*) made them a people of the past – – -”. Wrong. Neither
Ramses II nor the people of Egypt became a people of the past in the year 1235 BC (the
approximate year of the possible exodus, according to science). That did not happen until
much later – and the final doom came in 659 AD when the Arabs under Mu’awiya conquered
the country and took over – for ever (?). Muslims like to “explain” that “a people” means the
soldiers of Pharaoh. But the expression “a people” has a wider meaning than that.
**00c 43/59: “He (Jesus*) was no more than a servant – – -”. Possible. But there is still the
funny fact that thousands heard him call Yahweh “father”. Whereas only one man – and a man
of very questionable character and ethics, claims the opposite – and this even a man who had
much to gain from Jesus being not the son of God. And he claimed it as much as 600 years
later without any kind of documentation.
**024 43/63a: “(Jesus said*): therefore fear Allah – – -”. If Jesus had been a missionary for
a known polytheistic god from a not too far of country, he for one thing had got very few
followers in the at that time strictly monotheistic Israel, and for another thing he had
been killed by the clergy long before – especially if he all the same got a big following like
he really did. This is a tale told by someone who knew the religious and political situation in
Israel around year 30 AD badly.
025 43/63b: “(Jesus said*): fear Allah and obey me – – -.” This is really is Muhammad’s
slogan – he wanted power, and religion/Allah was his Platform of Power. And many places in
the Quran it becomes clear that Muhammad wants everyone to believe he was a “normal” (but
top) prophet (actually he was no real prophet, as he did not have the gift of making prophesies
– see chapter about Muhammad), and then it was nice if Jesus used the same words like
Muhammad and showed this was normal for prophets to say. But one of the really – and one
of many – fundamental differences between Jesus and Muhammad (and for that case between
f. ex. Buddha and Muhammad), was that Jesus was absolutely not interested in power on this
Earth. Consequently this slogan that Muhammad very frequently used in different
varieties to secure his power, was meaningless for Jesus. (The Quran does not oppose what
can be taken as a fact: That Jesus preached, but did not seek power on Earth.)
026 43/64: “(Jesus said): For Allah, He is my Lord and your Lord – – -”. See 43/63 just above.
We may add that starters of new religions or sects often try to “high-jack” well known
persons or situations to use it in their teachings. This may look like such a case.
027 43/69: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
028 43/78a: “Verily, We (Allah*) have brought – – – (the Quran*) – – -”. Is it really an
omniscient god that has produced it? See 40/75 and 41/12
029 43/78b: “Verily, We (Allah*) have brought the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. At most the
Quran is partly the truth. See 40/75 and 41/12.
030 43/78c: “- – – but most of you (non-Muslims*) have a hatred to the Truth.” The truth – see
40/75 and 41/12. And in addition:
446
1. *Few hate – but many are frightened.
2. Quite a number feel distasted because of the
inhuman and unjust laws and traditions in
Islam.
3. **There is a difference between frightened
strength and frightened weakness – a fact that
sometimes is forgotten.
*00d 43/81: “If (Allah) Most Gracious had a son, I (Muhammad*) would be the first to
worship”. Some proof!! But for that: There still is Jesus calling Yahweh father. And any
neutral professor of history would say that according to all normal rules, the Bible should be
more reliable than the Quran as a source of correct history: Very much closer in time to Jesus,
thousands of witnesses, many narrators, versus one single narrator without good sources and
600 years later – and even a man of dubious character and with strong motif to reduce Jesus to
become the greatest prophet himself – and a man clearly lusting for power (just read the Quran
and the Hadits – it is easy to see f. ex. his gluing himself to the god.). A man that definitely
had not been accepted as a reliable witness in any country with a reliable judicial system. (The
real and historic Muhammad was something quite different from the glossy semi-saint Islam
and Muslims claims – a claim made necessary because all Islam only is built on this man’s
words – if he lies, the religion is a false one). Also: Science has shown that the never
dicumenter Islamic claim about falsification of the Bible is wrong.
031 43/82: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
032 43/84: “- – – He (Allah*) is full of Wisdom and Knowledge”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
033 43/85: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
034 43/86: “- – – only he (the not capital “h” must be a misprinting – it refers to Allah*) who
bears witness to the Truth – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
035 43/87a: “If thou (Muhammad or Muslims*) ask them, Who created them, they will
certainly say, Allah – – -”. Wrong. See f. ex. 43/9 – and many others.
036 43/87b: “- – – the Truth (the Quran*) – – -.” The Quran at best is only partly true – too
much is wrong.
Surah 43: At least 36 mistakes + 4 likely mistakes.
SURAH 44:
*001 44/2: “- – – the Book (the Quran*) that makes things clear – – -”. A book with this many
mistakes and dubious arguments – see 40/75 and 41/12 – dictated by a man with a dubious
character – see f. ex. 31/30 – does not make things clear.
002 44/4: “In that (night) (when the first surah is said to be sent down*) is made distinct every
affair of wisdom”. As for wisdom in the Quran – see 40/75 and 41/12.
003 44/6: “He (Allah*) hears and knows (all things) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
447
004 44/7: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
005 44/25-28: “Thus (was their (pharaoh Ramses II and his men*) end – – -”. We know from
other parts of the Quran that the end was drowning. Wrong, at least for Ramses II himself – he
did not die by drowning (if he had done, you bet three religions had screamed about it!), and
he only died years later than the possible exodus in ca. 1235 BC according to science.
006 44/33: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
007 44/38: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
Surah 44: At least 7 mistakes.
SURAH 45:
00a 45/2a: “The revelation of the Book (the Quran*) – – -.” There never were any proofs for
anything. So many things are wrong with the Quran, that it has to be proved it really was
revealed.
001 45/2b: “The revelation of the Book (the Quran*) is from Allah – – -”. See 40/75 and
41/12.
002 45/2c: “(Allah is) Full of Wisdom.” See 40/75.
003 45/3a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
004 45/3b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
005 45/4: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
**006 45/5a: “And the alternation of the Night and Day – – – are Signs for those who are
wise”. Not unless Islam proves it is Allah who alternates night and day. They may say that
Allah made the physical laws – but then they will have to prove it – – – “strong claims demands
strong proofs”. And of course they will have to compete with all other religions trying to say
and do the same, with the same cheap words. Words are cheap as long as you do not have to
prove them – and very little in the Quran is proved.
***In Islam the educated ones know nothing is proved. The defence is that “any intelligent
person can see from the texts in the Quran that they have to be sent down by an omniscient
god” (!!). All the mistakes and all the invalid “proofs” etc. disapprove this. The second line of
defence is that it is “primitive” thinking to have to rely on proofs!!! (F. ex. in “The Message
of the Quran” that on top of all is “certified” by a top university – Al-Azhar in Cairo). The
reality is the 180-degree opposite: It is primitive – and naïve – thinking to accept loose
claims and often obviously wrong and unlikely statements without some sorts of proofs.
007 45/5b: “- – – the fact that Allah sends down Sustenance from the sky – – -.” As “always”
the Quran makes a claim only, and proves nothing. As long as it is not proved, it is not a fact
– words are too cheap. Actually this is one of the very many cases where the Quran takes a
natural a phenomenon – here rain – and unceremoniously say it is Allah that makes it – – – just
like any priest in any religion can say about his god or gods, just as cheaply.
448
008 45/5c: “(Allah*) revives thereafter the earth after its death (by sending rain*) – – -”. One
thing is that the Quran in no way proves that it is Allah who sends the rain – the book has a
strong tendency to give Allah credit without any documentation for natural occurrences. But:
If earth comes alive just because of water, it was not dead – it only looked like that.
009 45/5d: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
**010 45/6a: “Such are the Signs of Allah, which we (Allah*) rehearse to thee (Muhammad*)
in truth – – -”. A strange saying, as all “Signs” in the Quran are logically invalid, as they either
are claims or statements based on nothing or based on other invalid (not proved) claims,
statements, “proofs”, etc. There may be a few exceptions for some taken from the Bible, but
they in case indicate Yahweh.
011 45/6b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
012 45/8: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
013 45/9: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
014 45/11a: “This (the Quran*) is (true) Guidance – – -”. A book with perhaps 3ooo mistakes,
invalid statements, contradictions, etc., etc., is no true guidance. See 40/75 and 41/12.
015 45/11b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
016 45/13a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
017 45/13b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
018 45/17: “- – – Clear Signs – – -.” See 2/99.
00b 45/18: “Then We (Allah*) put thee on the (right) way of Religion – – -”. All the mistakes,
contradictions, invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs” gives reason for serious doubts about
that.
**019 45/19+20: “- – – Allah is the Protector of the Righteous. These are clear evidence to
men – – -”. Yes, but only if it is documented that Allah really is a protector. There are no
proofs for that in the Quran – only claims or statements based on invalid (not proved) claims
or loose statements, etc. There in reality is not even a single valid proof for Allah himself.
(But then it is not possible for humans to prove a god – only a god can do that. That is one of
the reasons why all the “proofs” in the Quran turn out invalid – Allah refused to or was unable
to prove anything).
020 45/20: “These are clear evidence to men and a Guidance – – – to (the believers*).” See
45/19+20 just above – how can an invalid “proof” be guidance? After all a proof is one or
more proven fact(s) that can give only one conclusion whereas Islam/Muhammad/the
Quran far too often use unproven claims or statement only as basis for new claims, instead of
proven facts – and then any conclusion is invalid.
021 45/22: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22.
449
022 45/25: “- – – Clear Signs – – -.” There are no clear signs of Allah – or of Muhammad’s
connection to a god – in all the Quran. See 2/22.
023 45/26: “- – – the Day of Judgement, about which there is no doubt – – -”. Because of all the
mistakes, etc., in the Quran, there is every reason for doubt, and especially about a Muslim
style Day of Judgement.
024 45/27: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
025 45/32: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
026 45/32: “- – – there was no doubt about its (the Judgement Day*) (coming) – – -”. See 45/26
above.
027 45/35: “- – – Signs of Allah – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 and 2/99 above.
028 45/36a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
029 45/36b: “- – – the Worlds – – -“. The trouble for the Quran is that the 7 Earths this refers
to, do not exist. See 65/12.
030 45/37a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
031 45/37b: “(Allah is*) Full of Wisdom”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
Surah 45: At least 31 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 46:
00a 46/2a: “The Revelation of the Book (the Quran*) – – -.” Back to square one – is the Quran
revealed? – and in case from whom? See 41/12.
001 46/2b: “(Allah is*) Full of Wisdom.” Not if the Quran is representative for it – too many
mistakes, etc. See 40/5 and 41/12.
002 46/3: “- – – heaven – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
003 46/4a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
004 46/4b: “Bring me (Muhammad*) a Book (revealed) before this (as a proof*) – – -“.
Wrong. A book in itself proves nothing – it is as easy to falsify a book as it is to falsify
speech. F. ex. the Quran can well be a falsification – made by Muhammad or someone.
005 46/7a: “- – – Our (Allah’s) Clear Signs – – .” There are no clear signs from Allah in all the
Quran – see 2/99.
006 46/7b: “- – – the Unbelievers say of the Truth (the Quran*) – – -.” See 2/99 and 40/75
above.
450
**007 46/9: “I (Muhammad) am no bringer of a newfangled doctrine – – -”. Muhammad
pretended Islam was the continuation of – or the uncorrupted – religion of the Jews and the
Christians. That is not true – especially in the NT it is clear that the teachings
fundamentally are so different (and sciens has prowed that Islam’s undocumented
claims about falsification of the Bible are wrong), that it can not be the same god – at
least if he is not mentally ill. See 29/46 and 12/111.
***008 46/10: “If (this teaching) be from Allah, and ye (non-Muslims) reject it, and a witness
from among the Children of Israel testifies to its similarity (with earlier scriptures (what is
Muhammad’s definition of “similarity” here?*)), and has believed (or pretended to believe –
sometimes that was necessary*) while ye are arrogant, (how unjust ye are) – – -”. This
sentence is a bit complicated, but what Muhammad said, was that a Jew agreed – true or not
true – to that the Quran was similar to old Jewish scriptures, and that non-Muslims then are
unjust not accepting that Muhammad is a real prophet.
1. Tales like this are quite common among self
proclaimed prophets trying to prove their new
religion or sect. They may be true or not true.
2. We only have Muhammad’s word for this – a
man who had initiated or himself done a lot of
dubious deeds included lying/betrayal, and on
top of that had a lot to gain from making
people believe him, a man who lusted for
power – and one who was teaching a dubious
tale. There are no other sources. The tale may
be true or not true.
3. We do not know how many Jews lived in the
neighbourhood of Mecca/Medina. But in only
one tribe he destroyed, there were 700 men
(all murdered – in Khaybar. Plus the 29 from
the peace delegation he invited and murdered
earlier). As families tended to be large, that
should mean some 2ooo-3ooo women and
children in addition (all made slaves). And
there were three big tribes (and some small
ones) and thus thousands of Jews – and the
women at least here cannot be omitted, as
they tend to be more religious than men. It
would be most surprising if not one or a few
of them wanted to humour the power-that-be
or really changed the religion – from belief or
greed or fright or other reasons.
4. But all the other – thousands and thousands –
of Jews said Muhammad was wrong. This
even when he marched against them with his
army, and they knew to humour him meant
“no war”. Even when they had to give him all
their farms and become day workers for him –
still knowing that humouring him meant they
would keep their possessions if they in time
451
had humoured him. Even those who had to
flee, loosing everything they could not carry –
knowing that if they humoured him, they
could stay. Not to mention the 700 men of
Khaybar – knowing they were murdered by
the half-dozens through the day and far into
the night, and that humouring him perhaps
could save their lives. All said no;
Muhammad was too wrong to be possible to
accept even then.
5. Even if it was correct that one or a few Jew
said yes – which well may be true: “One
swallow makes no summer”. (It also may be a
made up story – that often happens in new
sects to “prove” they are right.)
All in all: This “proof” has no value. According to the Jews Muhammad was very wrong. And
even more: We still have the same books of Moses – the Torah is unabrigded for at least 1000
years before Muhammad according to science – and the rest of the Jewish Bible (the OT) that
the Jews in Arabia had. Anyone can read and see they were right.
009 46/12a: “- – – this Book (the Quran) confirms (it (the Torah*)) – – -”. See 46/10 just above,
and especially the last lines. No one knew or know the Torah better than the Jews. Wrong.
010 46/12b: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for for the ones
not suppressed – and really glad only for the ones looking for booty and slaves and stolen
riches, and not least for the ones near the top of the pyramid that got – and get – a lot of power
in addition. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and
charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as
hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and
humane and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings for the minor percentage of
people that need a religion to lean on – at least for the possible ones where the old pagan
religion was not strong enough.
011 46/16: “- – – a promise of truth (the words of the Quran concerning Paradise*) – – -”. See
40/75 and 41/12 – the promise of Paradise is part of it.
00b 46/17: “For the promise of Allah is true.” That may be – if he exists (there is not one
single proof, and the number of tries with invalid proofs, etc., make no good impression, as
that normally is the hallmarks of cheats and deceivers). But there are good reasons for doubt,
as the only source for information is the Quran, and very much there is not correct – or
doubtful.
012 46/27: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
013 46/30a: “We (some Jinns*) have heard a Book (the Quran*) revealed after Moses,
confirming what came before it – – -”. Jinns were beings “borrowed” from Arab fairy tales,
legends and from the old Arab pagan religion – Muhammad mostly based his world on the
(contorted) biblical legends – – – and on Arab traditions (the rest of the world made little or no
traces in Allah’s religion – nothing from the Americas or Australia f. ex. But may be the
452
uneducated, warlike Arabs had done things almost correct in most of the religious aspects in
their pagan religion? – only the Arabs of the ones without a Book?).
014 46/30b: “- – – confirming what (Torah,Bible*) came before it (the Quran*) – – -“. As for
confirming the Torah and also the Bible: See 40/75 and 46/10.
015 46/30c: “- – – it (the Quran*) guides (men) – – -”. A book with that many mistakes and
invalid “proofs” etc. is no reliable guide.
016 46/30c: “- – – it (the Quran*) guides men to the Truth – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
017 46/33: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
011 46/34a: “Is this not the Truth? (= what was told in the Quran*)”. With all its mistakes etc.
the Quran at best is partly true.
019 46/34b: “- – – ye were wont to deny (truth (the Quran*))!” See 46/34a just above.
Surah 46: At least 19 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 47:
00a 47/2a: “- – – believe in the (Revelation) sent down to Muhammad – – -”. Was it really sent
down? See 42/12.
001 47/2b: “- – – for it (the Quran*) is the Truth – – -”. See 40/75.
002 47/2c: “- – – for it (the Quran*) is the Truth from their (Muslims‘*) Lord (Allah*) – – -.” Is
it? No. See 40/75 and 41/12.
003 47/3a: “- – – those who believe follow the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. Do they? See 40/75.
004 47/3b: “- – – the Truth (the Quran*) from their Lord (Allah*) – – -”. Is it? Not if Allah is
omniscient – too much is wrong in the book. See 41/12 + 40/75.
****005 47/4: This is a really serious one: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in
fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond
firmly (on them) – – -.” BUT OUR SOURCES TELL THAT THE WORDS “(in fight)” IS
NOT WRITTEN IN THE ARAB TEXT – IT IS ADDED BY THE TRANSLATOR. Muslims
primarily shall read the Quran in Arab, and there in case the text is: “Therefore, when ye meet
the Unbelievers, smite at their necks – – -“. It in case simply is a permanent order to be
aggressive.
The real religion of peace.
006 47/9: “- – – the Revelation (the Quran*) of Allah – – -.” It is highly questionable if the
Quran is a real revelation. What is not questionable is that it in no case came from an
omniscient god (too much is wrong), and from no good god (too inhuman, too unfair, too
harsh, too hateful, too bloody.)
453
007 47/10: “Do they (non-Muslims*) not travel through the earth, and see what was the End
of those before them (who did evil)?” In the Middle East there are scattered ruins – houses,
villages, towns. Muhammad claimed – as normal without any proof – that they all were
results of Allah’s punishment for disbelief and sins. But in an arid and harsh country which on
top of all was settled by warlike inhabitants, there were many other reasons for empty houses.
The statement that all were empty because of punishment for disbelief and other sins against
Allah need strong proofs from Islam to be believed.
008 47/14: “- – – on a clear (Path) from his (a person*) Lord (Allah*) (= living according to
the Quran) – – -“. The trouble is that so crooked, and of so doubtful clarity, as the Quran is, it
does not represent a clear path.
*009 47/16: “- – – those (Muslims*) who have received Knowledge (the Quran*) – – -”. The
Quran at best represents bits and pieces of knowledge, and it is difficult for uneducated people
to know what is true and what not. See 40/75 and 41/12 and others.
00b 47/27: “But how (will it be) when the angles take their souls at death – – -.” Is something
wrong here? In 32/11 there is a special angel – the Angel of Death – doing this, and in 39/42 it
is Allah.
*010 47/32: “- – – after Guidance (the Quran*) has been clearly shown to them (nonMuslims*) – – -”. There is not much guidance in a book with that much mistakes and cheating
(trying to use invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”). See 40/75. If there is some, it in no
way is “clear”.
Surah 47: At least 10 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 48:
001 48/4: “- – – Allah is Full of Wisdom – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
002 48/7: “- – – (Allah is*) Full of Wisdom – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
003 48/8a: “We (Allah*) have truly sent thee (Muhammad*) as a witness – – -”. Is this
reliable? – in a book with this much mistakes, invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”? There
is only one possible answer to that: A “witness” bringing so much wrong information and
wrong fact, is not sent from an omniscient god. And one may add: A “witness” bringing so
much injustice, hate and misery to the world, is not sent by a good and benevolent god. If
Muhammad at all was sent, on may speculate about by whom. Personally we hardly believe
he was sent by even a devil, though the religion as preached in the Quran fits any devil well.
But not even a devil would make a “holy” book with so many mistakes and errors – he would
be found out sooner or later.
***But may be a devil knew that mistakes so not matter very much – may be he knew that
religiously blind persons are unable to see even the most obvious mistaken facts, because
they do not want to see them?
004 48/8b: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for the ones not
suppressed – and really glad only for the ones looking for booty and slaves and stolen riches,
and not least for the ones near the top of the pyramid that got – and get – a lot of power in
454
addition. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and
charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as
hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and
humane and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings for the minor percentage of
people that need a religion to lean on – at least for the possible ones where the old pagan
religion was not strong enough.
005 48/19: “- – – Allah is – – – Full of Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12 and others.
006 48/20: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
007 48/26: “And Allah has full knowledge of all things”. The Quran proves the opposite (see
40/75) – – – if not the Quran is a falsification.
008 48/28: “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad*) with Guidance – – –
”. There is not much guidance in a teaching based on a book with that many mistakes and
littered with hallmarks of a cheat and deceiver (loose statements and invalid “signs” and
“proofs”).
009 48/28: “- – – Guidance and the Religion of Truth, to proclaim it over all religion – – -”. At
most partly the truth. See 40/75. The second part of the sentence tells volumes about Islam.
00a 48/29: “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.” There are so many mistakes and so many
places tried cheating and deceiving in the Quran – is this any more reliable? – especially as it
is said by the man himself, a man who was unreliable and who clearly liked power?
Surah 48: At least 9 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 49:
001 49/1: “- – – Allah – – – knows all things.” Not if he composed the Quran. See 40/75.
002 49/8: “- – – Allah is full of Knowledge and Wisdom”. See 40/75.
003 49/13a: “- – – We (Allah*) created you (man*) from a single (pair) of male and female – –
-”. Adam and Eve never were, according to science. Besides if everything had started with
just one pair, the DNA-variety had been too small to make the group viable in the long run =
man had died out after some generations. (Actually science says that to have enough DNA
variety + have a reasonable safety margin against dangerous illnesses, a group of animals (ot
humans) should consist of minimum some 2000 members – and spread around some to reduce
the impact of contagious illnesses – to be sure to be viable in the long run.)
004 49/13b: “And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things).” Not if
he has and respects the “Mother Book” (see f. ex. 43/4) like the Quran revered in his heaven,
and not if he sent down a copy of a book with that much wrong contents as a basis for his
religion. See 40/75 and 41/12. Also see 4/176 – 27/6 – 27/44 – 48/26 – 49/1 – 49/16 – 49/18 –
57/3 – 64/4 – 65/12 – 67/13.
**Besides: Have you ever noticed that the one who needs to boast – loudly and frequently –
about how truthful he is, is the cheater, and the one boasting about his knowledge is the
455
mediocre to rather, but not top, intelligent ones? – the really honest and the really intelligent
persons never need to boast about those things. Real honesty and real intelligence makes itself
felt after some time of close connection – if there is a need for boasting, something is wrong.
005 49/16a: “But Allah knows all that is in heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth – – -”. Not
if he reveres a “mother book” (43/4) like the Quran in his heaven. See 40/75 and 41/12.
006 49/16b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
007 49/18: “Verily Allah knows the secrets of the heavens (plural and wrong – some proofs or
statements the Quran chooses) and the earth – – -”. Not if he reveres a “Mother Book” (43/4)
he has copied the Quran from, in his heaven”. See 40/75, 41/12 and 49/16a above.
Surah 49: At least 7 mistakes.
SURAH 50:
001 50/1a: “- – – by the Glorious Quran – – -”. A book with that many mistakes, contradictions,
etc., and with so many hallmarks of cheating and deceiving (loose statements, invalid “signs”
and “proofs”, etc.) is not glorious. By the way the expression is an oath – swearing by the
Quran. Hope the rest is true, if not it is a false swearing. Though in Islam in some cases false
oaths are permitted – or can be forgiven if paid for).
00a 50/1b: “- – – by the Glorious Quran (thou (Muhammad*)) art Allah’s Messenger”. See
49/29.
00b 50/3: “What! When we die and become dust (shall we live again?)”. Muhammad thought
that at the Day of Doom all humans would be revived in flesh and bodily and not least
mentally to be just the same humans that they were here on Earth except rejuvenated – Allah
would assemble all the bones, dust, fluids and gas molecules you ones consisted of, and
recreate your (former) body and soul from it (though in the shape of a young and goodlooking individual – but as the Quran talks little about your children in Paradise, it is unclear
if babies and children that died were/are recreated as adults or not. It also is unclear if they
will be self-sufficient in Paradise, or only members of your family) Believe it who wants to.
002 50/5: “But they (non-Muslims*) deny the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See f. ex. 40/75 and
41/12.
**003 50/6: “- – – and there are no flaws in it (the sky*) – – -”. The sky is two different optical
illusions – by day one made by bending of sunlight, and by night by our inability to see the 3
dimensions at long distances:
1. As the sunlight by day hits the entire
atmosphere and bends light all over, flaws are
difficult to see by the naked eye. (There really
are no flaws, but shimmering because of
temperature differences is easy to see when
you use a telescope – and by night sometimes
the flickering of stars). Once more a natural
occurrence the Quran says is because of
456
Allah, without any proof. Another loose
statement.
2. At night we see deep into the vacuum of
space. There are no visible flaws in vacuum.
Once more: A loose statement without real
value – except for cheaters and deceivers.
Any priest in any religion can say just the same about his god(s). Words are that cheap.
Besides: How can there be flaws in optical illusions? And physically speaking: How can there
be visible flaws in vacuum?
004 50/7: “And the earth – we (Allah*) have spread it out – – -”. The Quran tells the earth is
flat – may be like a disk, but flat. Wrong.
005 50/11: “- – – and We (Allah*) give (new) life therewith (with water*) to land that is dead –
– -”. Land that comes alive just with water is not dead – it is alive with seeds and perhaps
roots.
006 50/13: “- – – the bretheren of Lut (Lot*) – – -.” This refers to the people of Sodom and
Gomorrah, but it is extremely clear that they were not his “bretheren”. For one thing he was a
stranger from very far away, and for another it is very clear from both the Bible and from the
Quran that he was at odds with them – the connection was nowhere like a naturalized
“brother”. Simply wrong.
The only reason we can see for the use of this word, is that Muhammad wanted the situation
to fit into his statement that prophets were sent to their own people – “their own brethren”.
Wrong – and forgetting also about f. ex Jonah.
007 50/19: “- – – Truth (like in the Quran*) – – -”. See 49/75.
008 50/37a: “Verily in this is a Message (the Quran*) – – – .” There simply is no message in it
– not from Allah – until Islam really proves that Allah really said and did all that this refers to.
009 50/37b: “Verily in this is a Message (the Quran*) – – – (that is*) (the truth) – – -.” See
40/75. There simply is no message in it, until Islam really proves that Allah really did all that.
*010 50/38a: “We (Allah*) created the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth and all
between them in Six Days”. Flatly wrong – it took some billions of years.
011 50/38b: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
00c 50/38c: “- – – nor did any sense of weariness (from creating everything in 6 days*) touch
Us (Allah*).” Why then has the week 7 days (the Bible tells the god rested the 7. day)?
Surah 50: At least 11 mistakes + 3 likely mistakes.
SURAH 51:
457
001 51/5: “(The Quran swears in 51/1 to 51/4 that) Verily what ye (Muslims*) are promised
(in the Quran*) is true – – -“. With so many mistakes, etc. – and even obvious lies – in that
book, also this hardly is true. It at least will need solid proofs.
002 51/8: “Truly you (people/non-Muslims*) are in a doctrine discordant”. Some may be yes,
some may no. Among the ones in “may be yes” are the Muslims, as all the mistakes and
worse in the Quran prove absolutely that something is wrong with that book and that religion.
003 51/9: “Through which (non-Muslims*) are deluded (away from the Truth)”. As for truth,
see 40/75.
004 51/20: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
***005 51/23: “- – – by the Lord (Allah*) of heaven and earth (the Quran/Allah is swearing by
Allah!!*), this (the promise of Paradise*) is the very truth – – -”. We have to hope so, as a false
oat is not good in Islam either – but one can pay compensation, and if it was said thoughtlessly
it may even be forgiven without (and if it is to defend or forward Islam, it is an obligation to
do so if necessary). But for truths in the Quran see 40/75, 41/12 and others. (Sentences in the
Quran that starts with “by” normally are oaths.)
006 51/30: “- – – He (Allah*) is full of Wisdom and Knowledge.” See 40/75.
007 51/37: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
008 51/38: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
009 51/40: “So We (Allah*) took him (Pharaoh Ramses II*) and his forces, and threw them
into the sea (where they drowned*)”. For one thing they were not thrown into the sea, they
went themselves (according to the Bible and not opposed by other places in the Quran) out on
the dry sea bed, and then the water returned), but for another: At least Ramses II himself did
not die by drowning and he also did not die until some years later, according to science.
010 51/41: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
011 51/43: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
**00a 51/47: “- – – it is We (Allah*) Who created the vastness of space.” Here is a point that
should be controlled: According to one of our sources, the word that is used in Arab is
“samaa” which is said to mean “sky”, whereas the Arab word for “universe” or “space” is said
to be “al-kawn”. We have till now been unable to check this for sure, but mention it because
such dishonesty tells so very much if it is true – and we find half truths or cases of al-Taqiyya
too often in Islamic media/books (though we had originally not expected it from a man like
Yusuf Ali).
012 51/48: “And We (Allah*) have spread out the (spacious) earth – – -”. From other places in
the Quran we know the spreading out is like a carpet – and the earth is flat. Wrong.
*013 51/49: “And of every thing We (Allah*) have created pairs – – -”. Very wrong. This only
goes for multi-cellular beings, and not even for all of them – among primitive animals and
even up to reptiles and fish you find some kinds that propagate asexually, and thus do not
458
make pairs. Uni-cellular beings are not in pairs, and there are by far many more of them both
in species and in total numbers. Any god had known – Muhammad not. Who made the
Quran?
**014 51/50: “I (Muhammad*) am from Him (Allah*) a warner to you – – -.” Here is one
more of those really bad ones: Suddenly the book changes from Allah speaking to
Muhammad speaking. But how is it possible for Muhammad to speak in a book that
pretends to be billions of years old (from eternity – before the universe was created 13.7
billion years ago) or made by Allah in his heaven?
Surah 51: At least 14 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 52:
001 52/5: “By (Allah is swearing*) the Canopy (heaven*) Raised High – – -”. There is no
canopy/material heaven, only optical illusions. What does it mean that Allah swears by
something he should know did not exist??
002 52/11: “- – – those who treat (Truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood – – -”. At least it is not the
full truth – see 40/75 and 41/12 and others.
003 52/36: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
004 52/44: “Were they (non-Muslims*) to see a piece of the sky falling (on them), they would
only say:’ Clouds gathered in heaps!” The sky is an optical illation (or actually two). A piece
of an optical illation cannot fall. (It is clear from the text that it is not meant clouds, and it is
clear from other places in the Quran that meteorites (shooting stars) are known – it really is a
piece of the sky that is meant).
Surah 52: At least 4 mistakes.
SURAH 53:
*001 53/2: “Your Champion (Muhammad*) is neither astray nor being misled.” All the
mistakes, etc. proves that he at least was somewhat astray. Though all the hallmarks of a
cheat, deceiver and swindler may indicate that may be he was not misled – those last 3
words may be true, as may be he was misleading.
*002 53/3: “Nor does he (Muhammad*) say (aught) of (his own) desire”. It will take strong
proofs to prove that surahs like no. 66 or no. 111 are worthy of and belongs in a revered
Mother Book in Paradise – that may be has existed since eternity. And also to prove they are
worthy a book revered by an omniscient and omnipotent god.
00a 53/5: “- – – one Mighty in Power (Allah*) – – -.” But is Allah mighty in power? – there is
not one single proof for that. Lots and lots of words – even big words – but not one single
proof.
003 53/6: “(Allah is*) Endued with Wisdom – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
004 53/11a: “The (Prophet’s (Muhammad’s*)) – – -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet.
The definition of a prophet is a person that:
459
1. Has the gift of and close enough connection
to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least
mostly come true.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential
prophesies, that it is a clear part of his
mission.
A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things
through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this
is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that
anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention
pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented
that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and
Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”
– prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles
connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a
and 30/46a.
Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or
something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed”
that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.
00b 53/11b: “The (Prophet’s (Muhammad’s*)) (mind and) heart in no way falsified that
which he saw.” If the Quran is fundamentally different from the Bible, and the Bible is not
falsified according to science – in spite of Islam’s not documented claims – what explanations
are then left?
00c 53/18a: “For truly did he (Muhammad*) see – – -“. How truly is it really? – in a book with
this many mistakes and from a man with so suspect morality that not even his oaths are holy?
005 53/18b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
006 53/26: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
007 53/28: “- – – conjecture avails nothing against Truth (the Quran*)”. Actually that is the
question concerning the Quran: How much is true and how much is conjecture – and how
much is not even that? See 40/75 + 41/12.
008 53/31: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
*009 53/45+46: “- – – He (Allah*) did create (man*) in pairs – male and female – From a seed
(the semen*) when lodged (in its place (a female womb*)).” Muhammad believed the semen
was some sort of a seed that could start to grow when planted in a woman. Wrong – or at best
half the story. But Muhammad obviously did not know the other half – the egg cell – as the
same story is told several times in the Quran. Actually this was the going zoology at the time
of Muhammad – one did not know how conception happened, and did not know the egg cell.
A god had known better. Who made the Quran?
460
*010 53/49: “- – – He (Allah) is the Lord of Sirius (the Mighty Star) – – -”. Sirius it not very
mighty, even if it may look like that from Earth. It is a dwarf compared to stars like
Betelgeuse, Aldebaran and millions more. And just a firecracker compared to f. ex. the
enormously potent Eta Carinae (borderline enormous for exploding, and expected to go
supernova in the astronomically near future). Not to mention compared to the real giants.
**011 53/56: “This is a Warner (Muhammad*), of the (series of) Warners of the old”.
Muhammad impressed and impressed and impressed on his followers that he was one of a
long series – though the greatest of all – of prophets (even though he per definition was no
prophet, as he did not have the gift of making prophesies – he just “borrowed” that prestigious
title), as that gave him “weight” and prestige. And to belong to the one timeless “right”
religion, also gave his teachings weight among the ones that believed it (Science have never
found any traces of a religion like Islam anywhere or any time before 610 AD – if they had,
you bet Islam had told about it.) But he in case definitely did not belong to the same series
as the Jewish prophets, included Jesus – the teachings were too different. AND they made
prophesies – real prophesies – which he was unable to.
Surah 53: At least 11 mistakes + 3 likely mistakes.
SURAH 54:
001 54/2: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
002 54/5: “(The Quran is*) Mature wisdom – – -”. Hardly. See 40/75, 41/12 and others.
003 54/6: “Therefore (O Prophet (Muhammad*)!)” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The
definition of a prophet is a person that:
1. Have the gift of and close enough connection
to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least
mostly come true.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential
prophesies, that it is a clear part of his
mission.
A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things
through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this
is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that
anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention
pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented
that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and
Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”
– prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles
connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a
and 30/46a.
Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or
something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed”
that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.
461
004 54/11: “So We (Allah*) opened the gates of Heaven (here = the religiously defined
Heaven as it f. ex. is written with capital “H”, not a substitute word for the sky or clouds*)
with water pouring forth”. But the material heavens that Muhammad believed in, did not exist
– and thus could not contain water.
005 54/15: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
***006 54/17: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand – – -.” See
54/32 below.
007 54/18: “The Ad (people) rejected (truth (the teachings of the Quran*)) – – -.” Those
teachings at best only are partly true – too many mistakes, etc.
008 54/19: “For We (Allah*) sent against them (the people of Ad*) a furious wind, on a Day
of violent Disaster”. Well something is wrong – and contradicting – as here it is said one day,
in 41/16 it is said (several) days and in 69/7 is said 6 nights and 7 days.
***009 54/22: “But We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand – – -.” See
45/32 below.
010 54/32: “But We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand – – -”. This in a
way is very correct – the language is plain and simple mostly, and the Quran itself makes it
clear that one is to understand it literally. Also the statement that it is easy to understand,
means that it is to be understood like it is written – if not it was not “easy to understand”,
(though many Muslims claim that verses that are wrong, are allegories – it is an easy way to
use to flee from difficult questions)
But it is all the same at least partly wrong – partly because there are so many places where it
is difficult to guess which word is really meant. Separate books are needed to explain the
Quran – there are many such ones. And if you read any of the good ones, you will find that
even today there are many points in the book Islam has not been able to understand, and even
many more points they still do not know the exact meaning of – or which one of two or more
meanings is the correct one (though Islam tells that all possible meanings are correct ones –
they call it “different ways of reading” to hide the facts that the book for one thing is unclear,
and for another that there exist many possible varieties). But it is easy too see that Muhammad
meant it was easy and not complicated to understand – and an omniscient god had been able to
compose a book that was possible to understand and impossible to misunderstand or not
understand, just like Muhammad claimed and surely believed and intended. Who composed
the Quran?
011 54/40: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand – – -”. See
54/32 just above.
012 54/42: “- – – Our Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
013 54/55: “An Assembly of Truth – – -“. With so much wrong in the book and hence in the
religion, this needs solid proof to be believed by us.
Surah 54: At least 13 mistakes.
462
SURAH 55:
001 55/2: “It is He (Allah*) Who has thought the Quran.” See 40/75, 41/12 and others.
002 55/3: “He (Allah*) has created man”. At least not like told in the Quran – see 6/2. Besides
man was not created according to science – he developed from an earlier primate. If Islam
says he was created, they will have to prove it.
003 55/10: “It is He (Allah*) who has spread out the earth – – -”. We know from other places
in the Quran that the spreading out, was like a carpet – Muhammad believed the Quran was
flat. Wrong.
*004 55/14: “He (Allah*) created man from ringing clay like unto pottery”. Wrong – but
somewhat funny. See 6/2.
**00a 55/15: “And He (Allah*) created Jinns from fire free of smoke.” Jinns are beings from
old Arab folklore, fairy tales and legends relating to the old Arab pagan religion. Is just by coincidence that these beings in Allah’s world – that according to the Quran are real beings –
before only were known to the Pagan Arabs and not to any others, not even the real (?)
prophets in the Bible? – and not to any of the other prophets the Quran claims were spread all
over the world and to all times? Because no-one but the old Arabs and their neighbours knew
about jinns. In a religion for all the world and made by a god for the entire world, they never
manifested themselves any other place in the entire world than just in that area. What a lucky
coincident that Allah finally choose just an Arab – Muhammad – for a messenger, so that he
could tell the rest of the world what part the jinns play in the real religion. But it also is
strange that except for things borrowed from the Bible and a little from neighbouring
religions, there is nothing about or from the rest of the world in the Quran – and the Quran
practically has no stuff from those pasts of the world, even though there have been prophets
all over and to all times, according to that book. (Jinn often is translated with spirits (god or
bad) – but it is wrong, because the Arab word for spirits is “ruh”. Also other words for
supernatural beings from other cultures are used for translation, but it is symptomatic that top
translators do not translate the word, but use the Arab one – Jinns are a group of beings special
to Arab folklore and legends, and even the top translators do not find equivalent beings or
names in western languages.)
*000 55/17: “He (Allah*) is the Lord of the two Easts and the two Wests.” This cryptic
sentence means the northmost and the southmost points of the sun during a year (the
equinoxes) – in east and west. (We mention this because some Muslims try to find ways to
use this sentence to prove that the Quran says the Earth is globular.)
00b 55/24: “And His (Allah’s) are the Ships sailing – – -”. We never heard about a god owning
ships. It cannot be literally meant. But the Quran says it is to be read literally.
005 55/29: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
*00c 55/31: “- – – both ye worlds!” According to “The message of the Quran”, the Arab word
that is used here – “thaqalan” (not plural, but dualis of “thaqal”) does not really mean
“worlds”, but is normally translated with “humans and invisible beings”, but may also mean
“men and women” in other connections.)
463
006 55/33: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
**00d 55/56: The Muslim Paradise is quit like the Zoroastrian one (Zoroastrians mainly lived
in Persia, one of the big trading partners for Arabia. The Arabs knew that religion – hardly as
well as the Mosaic or the Christian religions, but at least superficially.) – except that the
houries there were named paaris. (Also the Jewish and Christian hell may have got inspiration
from the Zoroastrian one.)
Surah 55: At least 6 mistakes + 4 likely mistakes.
SURAH 56:
001 56/51: “- – – and treat (truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood! – -”. See 40/75, 41/12, and
others.
002 56/57: “- – – the Truth (the contents of the Quran*) – – -“. But the contents of the Quran at
best only is partly true – too much is wrong.
003 56/70: “- – – We (Allah*) could make it (all rain*) salt – – -”. Not without changing both
natural and the physical laws. If Islam insists it is true, they will have to prove it – words are
cheap.
004 56/80a: “A Revelation (the Quran*) from the Lord of the Worlds (Allah*) – – -”. Can it
really be so? See 41/12 – and 40/75. Impossible – no omniscient god would make/deliver a
book with so many mistakes – not to mention keep it in his own Heaven as a revered Mother
Book (13/39 – 43/4). Can this be a revelation from a god? Or the other way around: Can
something producing so many mistakes, contradictions, so much invalid logic be lord of even
one world? Also see 2/131 – 26/109 – 26/127 – 26/192.
005 56/80b: “- – – the Worlds.” The Quran says there are 7 (flat) Earths – and the Hadiths
place them one above the other and has named them. Wrong. See 65/12.
006 56/81: “Is it (the Quran*) such a Message that ye would hold it in light esteem?” This
rhetoric question demands the answer “no”. Wrong. With so much wrong in the book, it is
correct to hold it in very light esteem – if in esteem at all, as everything in it needs to be
documented to find out what is right and what is wrong in the book.
007 56/92: “- – – those (non-Muslims*) who treat (Truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood – – -”.
There really is a question: What is true and what is false in the Quran – see 40/75 and 41/12
and others.
008 56/95: “Verily, this (the description of hell in the Quran*) is the Very Truth and
Certainty”. Why should what the Quran says about Hell be more true and certain than the rest
of the book? See 40/75 and other places.
Surah 56: At least 8 mistakes.
SURAH 57:
001 57/1a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
464
002 57/1b: “- – – He (Allah*) is – – – the Wise.” Not according to all the mistakes, etc. in the
Quran.
003 57/2: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
004 57/3: “- – – He (Allah*) has full knowledge of all things”. Not if he had anything to do
with the Quran – see 40/75 and other places.
*005 57/4: “He (Allah*) it is who created the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth in six
days – – -”. It is not possible to doubt that Muhammad/the Quran means that it all took 6 days,
except one time it took 8 days (contradiction). Wrong. It in reality took billions of years.
006 57/4b: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
007 57/5: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
*008 57/6: “He (Allah*) merges Night into Day, and Day into Night – – -”. Wrong. It is the
sun and the revolving of the Earth that does this – any god knew it, but Muhammad not. Then
who made the Quran? If Islam still say Allah does it – or made the natural laws behind it –
they will have to bring proof – – – and not just words or statements any priest can use for any
god, as statements and words are very cheap.
009 57/9: “- – – manifest Signs – – -“. There are no manifest – sure – signs in the Quran. See
2/99.
010 57/10: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
011 57/16: “- – – the Truth (the Quran*) that has been revealed – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
012 57/17: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
013 57/19a: “- – – they (Muslims) are sincere (Lovers of Truth (the Quran*)) – – -”. See 40/75
+ 41/12.
014 57/19: “- – – Our (Allah’s Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
015 57/25: “- – – clear Signs – – -.” See 2/99.
***016 57/27: “- – – (Allah*) bestowed on him (Jesus*) the Gospel – – -”. For one thing is
seems that Muhammad did not know there were 4 Gospels – he always used singular. Worse
is that the Gospels were all written after his (Jesus’) death. Muslims try to “save the day” by
insisting that Allah used another Gospel which is now disappeared – a standard way for
Muslims to “explain” difficult points, and as normal without documentation. But in this case
they may even be right – there may have existed an older one (the possible original for 3 of the
known Gospels). The bad news is that we know that if it ever existed, also that one was
written after Jesus was dead, because a Gospel is the story of Jesus’ life and death and
resurrection, and it could not be written until after this had happened (and that possible
Gospel in case means that there is even shorter time between Jesus and the first written
Gospels).Muslims also never mention the other possible explanation for why the 3 are so
465
similar: That the oldest have been model for the two others. (In this case there was no older
Gospel they partly copied – and no claimed way out on this point for Muslims.)
Surah 57: At least 16 mistakes.
SURAH 58:
001 58/5: “- – – Clear Signs – – -.” See 2/99.
002 58/7a: “- – – Allah doth know (all) that is in the heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth –
– -”. Not if the Quran is a copy of a “mother book” (54/32) he reveres in his Heaven. See
40/75 and 41/12.
003 58/7b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
Surah 58: At least 3 mistakes.
SURAH 59:
001 59/1a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/2a.
00a 59/1a: “- – – He (Allah*) is exalted in Might – – -.” Is he? There nowhere – absolutely
nowhere – is any proof for his might or power. There are lots and lots and lots of big words
and boasting, but not one single valid proof – not one. And PS: Who in the normal world are
the ones that have to rely on big words and boasting? – the ones that lack true facts.
002 59/b: “- – – (Allah is*) the Wise.” See 58/7 just above and 40/75 + 41/12.
003 59/16: “- – – the Worlds!” Muhammad believed there were 7 (flat) Earths. Wrong. See
65/12.
00b 59/21: “Had We (Allah*) sent down this Quran on a mountain – – -”. Was it really an
omniscient god that sent it down? See 41/12 and 40/75.
004 59/22: “Allah – – – knows (all things) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12 – and others.
005 59/24a: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22.
006 59/24b: “(Allah* is) the Wise – -”. See 59/1 + 40/75 + 41/12.
Surah 59: At least 6 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 60:
001 60/1a: “- – – they (non-Muslims) have rejected the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75
and 41/12.
002 60/1b: “- – – the (Prophet (Muhammad*)) – – -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The
definition of a prophet is a person that:
466
1. Have the gift of and close enough connection
to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least
mostly come true – if not he is a false prophet.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential
prophesies, that it is a clear part of his
mission.
A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things
through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this
is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that
anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention
pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented
that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and
Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”
– prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles
connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a
and 30/46a.
Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or
something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed”
that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.
003 60/2: “- – – they (non-Muslims*) desire that ye (Muslims*) should reject the Truth.” As
for truth: See 40/75 and 41/12. As for the rest, may be the Quran is right – but for entirely
different reasons from what that book claims. Islam in its pure Quranic form is a very
destructive, inhuman and immoral religion, and when on top of that it is shiningly clear that
the Quran is not w divine work, we do not want our descendants to end up in something like
that
004 60/5: “(Allah*) – – – the Wise.” See 58/7 + 40/75 + 41/12.
005 60/10: “And Allah is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12.
006 60/12: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition
of a prophet is a person that:
1. Have the gift of and close enough connection
to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least
mostly come true.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential
prophesies, that it is a clear part of his
mission.
A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things
through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this
is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that
anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention
pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented
467
that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and
Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”
– prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles
connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a
and 30/46a.
Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or
something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed”
that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.
Surah 60: At least 6 mistakes.
Sub-total till here: 1634 mistakes + 197 likely mistakes.
PART II, CHAPTER 1, Subchapter 4, Section 7 (= II-1-4-7)
MISTAKES AND ERRORS – MISTAKEN FACTS – IN THE QURAN, THE
HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. THE
“COMPLETE” LIST – THE “ENCYCLOPAEDIA” – BASED ON SURAH
AND VERSE NUMBER
(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 – 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS,
CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT
SOMETHING IS WRONG – NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)
For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3,
Sections 1 through 16.
SOME CLEAR FACT MISTAKES AND
ERRORS IN SURAHS 61 THROUGH 80
IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY BOOK OF
MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND
ALLAH
Comments numbered by 3 numbers (included 00 or 0) a few places followed by one small
letter = clear mistakes. Comments numbered by 00 or 0 followed by 1, 2 or 3 letters (big or
small) = likely mistake.
SURAH 61:
001 61/1a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
002 61/1b: “- – – (Allah is*) the Wise.” See 40/75 + 41/12 + 59/1.
468
00a 61/5: “- – – I (Moses*) am the Messenger of Allah (sent) to you (Jews*) – – -.” Allah or
Yahweh? The Quran uses the name Allah for the god of the old Jews many places. Mostly we
have not “arrested” it, but it is extremely unlikely to be correct as the teachings are too
different.
Another point: In the book “The Message of the Quran”, certified by Al-Azhar Al-Sharif
Islamic Research Academy in Cairo (one of the 2-3 top universities in the Muslim world on
such subjects) in a letter dated 27. Dec. 1998, it is admitted rather reluctantly that there are no
proofs for Allah, and that it is not possible to prove him. An additonal point here is that if
there are no ptoof for Allah and impossible to ptove him, automatically there also is no proof
for, and impossible to prove Muhammad’s claimed connection to Allah.
***003 61/6a: “- – – (Jesus said*) I am the Messenger of Allah – – -”. If Jesus had said
something like this about the known polytheistic god from a not too distant foreign country,
for one thing he had not got many followers, and for another: The clergy had at once had an
excuse to have him killed. This verse is composed by someone not knowing the religious
and political realities in Israel around 30 AD.
004 61/6/b: “- – – (Jesus said that he came for*) confirming the Law (of Moses*) – – -.” What
he according to the Bible said, was that he had not come to finish that law, but to fulfil the law
and to save souls – which was not the same as he should confirm the old laws or was
prohibited from changing them or finish them. What he actually did according to the Bible,
was making a new covenant between man and Yahweh that “de facto” changed or finished
many of those old laws – a covenant Muslims never mention. To find the essence of it, read
about “the Last Supper” in the Bible. (There were at least 12 witnesses to that supper, and
they told about it to many afterwards.) F. ex. Luke 22/20.
***005 61/6c: “- – – (Jesus said: I am*) giving the Glad Tiding of a Messenger to come after
Me, whose name shall be Ahmad (another form of the name Muhammad*) – – -”. This is
quite a funny verse, as you meet Muslims that insists it is from the Bible. But there is not
anything remotely like this in the Bible, and neither in the some 13ooo relevant scriptures
or fragments found throughout the times, older than 610 AD – included some 300 from the
Gospels – nor in the some 30ooo references to biblical verses in other known manuscripts. It is
only to be found in the Quran. (The Bible also never – mever – gives names when it foretells
into the far future – also never about the name of the Messiah that was to come. Here you get
a clear name – quite a break of the rule – – – and unbelievably convenient for Muhammad, the
very man that told this. Believe it is a coincidence if you want.)
**And it is worth remembering that it is quite common for makers of new sects or religions to
connect themselves to a mother religion and bend that – or even highjack (parts of) it. The
founder of the Amaddijja-Muslims is really one of the latest examples, and Mormons tell
Jesus visited America during his last days on earth. Such things give roots, credence and
weight to a movement.
*Jesus told The Holy Spirit (also named the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of God, the Spirit of truth,
or only the Spirit – like Allah and like Muhammad it has more than one name) should come
shortly – which it did. And he told he himself should return once upon a time “to judge the
living and the dead“. But not a single word about any other – and not to mention not one with
a foreign name the Jews would question.
469
**We know of one place where Muhammad is mentioned: In the Barnabas Gospel – a most
apocryphal book – according to one of our sources it may even be written at the caliph’s court
in Baghdad (not very strange if it then mentions Muhammad). At least it seems clear that the
copy that present day copies are made from, is a late try to “connect” the religions. You need
to make up proofs only if you have no real ones. Muslims sometimes tell you this “gospel” is
a real one.
But the standard explanation Muslims follow – without proofs: The Bible is falsified and the
name Muhammad and the expectation of him taken out by bad conspiracies – people in that
area hve a strong tendency to look for and believe in conspiracy theories (We have a private
theory that the reason is that they never in their history have been used to relatively reliable
information). But in that case:
1. The life of the first Christians had been
entirely different – and their time scale had
been entirely different if any of them had
heard about another prophet to be expected
before the return of Jesus “to judge the living
and the dead”. (They would know the return
of Jesus would take much longer time than
they now believed, to give the new “prophet”
time to work).
2. The contents of the NT had been different –
not least the letters had been different. It
simply is a fairy tale made up to strengthen
Muhammad’s claim to be a prophet – like
some other self-proclaimed prophets. (Rather
ironic; as he did not have the gift of being
able to make prophesies – he did not even
claim or pretend he had it – he was not even a
real prophet. Messenger for someone or
something perhaps, but not a real prophet).
3. ***The Muslims only backs their claim on
one Greek word used in the Bible:
“parakletos” which means “helper” – Jesus
before he left Earth, promised to send his
disciples a helper – the Holy Spirit (which
arrived some days later – at Whitsun –
according to the Bible (a story that is not
negated in the Quran)).
1. Islam claims “parakletos” is a
misspelling for another Greek word
“periklytos”, which means “the highly
praised one”. In Aramaic “the highly
praised” means “Mawhamana” of
which the second part of that word as
a verb is “hamida” (= to praise) and as
a noun “hamd” (law or praise). If you
then continue to Arab the names
Muhammad and Ahmad (another
470
variant of the name Muhammad) both
derives from “hamida” or “hamd”
according to Islam. Which to Islam
and all Muslims is a strong proof for
that “parakletos” in reality is
misspelled and means “Muhammad”
in the Gospel after John (f. ex. John
14/16) – Islam and Muslims have
difficulties of seing the difference
between a possible (and often
unlikely) explanation and a proof
when they wish a claim to be a proof.
Here the claim is a not very
convincing proof to say the least of it
– and in addition:
2. The word “periklytos” that Islam
claims is misspelled – the only
possibility they have to get the answer
they want and desperately need (they
need it desperately, because the Quran
clearly tells that Muhammad is
foretold also in the NT – – – and he is
not there) – does not exist at all in the
Bible, not to mention in the NT. It is
not used one single time.
3. The word “periklytos” also is not
found one single time in all the some
13ooo relevant manuscripts and
fragments science knows from before
610 AD. Neither in one single place or
time, nor in one single of the many
manuscripts.And as bad: Not in one
single of the thousands of other old
manusctipts that make references to
the Bible. Not one single time.
4. Worse: Neither is it found in any of
the some 300 copies or fragments of
Gospels older than 610 AD or in other
manuscripts referring to the Gospels.
5. *The word “periklytos” simply never
was used in the old scriptures that
became the Bible. The word that is
used everywhere is “parakletos” –
“helper” (and a helper was what the
disciples needed). This goes for each
and every known copy.
6. **Beside: How could it be possible to
falsify – as Islam claims – the same
word the same way in hundreds and
thousands of manuscripts – and how
471
to find each and every “periklytos” in
each and every of the many different
manuscripts – spread over all those
countries? – and on top of all: In a
time with little travel and hardly any
media!? Islam has a tough job proving
their claim – and remember: It is the
ones making claims that have to prove
them, not others to disprove it. This
often is forgotten when Muslims
throw loose claims and statements
around.
7. *Muslims tries to explain that it could
not be a question of the Holy Spirit,
because the Holy Spirit already was
present. And the Holy Spirit was
present or visited Jesus. But it was not
part of the disciples – and that was
what happened at Whitsun according
to the Bible: They each got personal
contact with the Spirit, and that was
quite a change of a situation.
8. *Muslims also say that as two
different names for the Spirit is used
(the Spirit of Truth and the Holy Spirit
(you actually also have the Holy
Ghost, the Spirit of God (1. Mos. 1/2)
and only the Spirit)) it proves that
John does not mean the Holy Spirit,
when he uses the name “the Spirit of
truth” – “the Spirit of truth” must
mean the Muhammad that lies to his
followers in the Quran (“miracles will
make no-one believe”, f. ex.) and
advised his people to use al-Taqiyya
or even break their oaths if that gave a
better result. In addition to all the
other wrong logic here, this claim is
just as logical as to claim that the 99
names of Allah means there are 99
different gods, or the 5-6 or more
names of Muhammad means there
were 5-6 or more of him. The spirit
simply is named by (at least 5)
different names – and in addition it is
absolutely clear that in the whole
Bible there only is one spirit with a
special connection to Yahweh.
9. Jesus promised his disciples a helper –
a parakletos. If he had meant
472
Muhammad, how could Muhammad
be their helper when they were all
dead 500 years before he was even
born??
4. In the thousands of manuscripts older than
610 AD – the first point of time when
Christians could get a reason for such a
falsification – how was it possible to erase the
word paracletos with the primitive means of
that time, and fill inn the word perikletos
cletos instead, in such a way that modern
science are unable to find physical traces
from the erasing, unable to find chamical
differences in the ink that was used, and
unable to see any difference of the letters (all
people writed differently)?
5. There only is one conclusion – the conclusion
science has made long ago – possible to make
is this: This Islamic claim – like many others
– either is a lie (an al-Taqiyya?) or wishful
thinking.
Wishful thinking? – or a bluff? – or a lie/al-Taqiyya? At least science long ago has proved
from the old manuscripts that it is not true – the Bible never was falsified on this point either.
(But Islam HAS to find him somewhere there, if not the Quran is wrong on this for Islam very
essential point). Also see 7/157.
(As mentioned also the apocryphal (made up) “Gospel of Barnabas” sometimes is used as an
argument, because there Muhammad is clearly mentioned (no surprise if the theory that it is
made at the court in Bagdad is correct). The sorry fact, though, is that a made up gospel is a
made up gospel (there are a number of them) – and it tells something about Islam’s lack of
arguments that they continue to insist that may be it is not made up, and therefore is a proof
for Muhammad, when science is unanimous: It is one of the false ones. The only thing the
“Gospel of Barnabas” in reality proves, is that Islam has no real documentation for their claim
that Muhammad is mentioned in the NT, as they have to resort to that kind of argumentation).
***But the most solid proof for that the Bible is not falsified, comes from Islam itself. If they
had found one single solid proof for falsification of the Bible among all the many
thousands of old manuscripts that exists THEY HAD SCREAMED TO HOLY
HEAVEN ABOUT IT – and no-one has till now heard such a scream – not even after
1400 years!!!.
**00b 61/9a: “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad*) – – -”. With all
those mistakes in the claimed message, it is obvious that also this claim needs proofs –
especially since an illness like temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) easily can explain both his fits,
his sights (?) and his other experiences (?) – TLE often gives religious illusions like this
(source among others BBC). Add some personal “inspiration” or cunning to solve personal
and domestic problems, and add the contemporary wrong knowledge and science, and you
have the Quran exactly – with all its mistakes and other weaknesses.
473
**006 61/9b: “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad*) with Guidance –
– -”. A teaching based on a book containing unbelievable perhaps 3ooo+ mistakes, loose
statements, contradictions, invalid “signs” and “proofs” + at least some clear lies and
statements telling that Muhammad did not respect even his oaths too much, is not much of a
guidance.
***007 61/9c: “- – – the Religion of Truth, that may proclaim over all religion – – -”. See 40/75
and 41/12. It is also worth to remember that normal people of today – and earlier times –
would be reluctant with trusting or believing in a man with a CV like Islam tells Muhammad
had: Robbery, extortion, lies, broken oaths, incitement to hate, incitement to suppression of all
opponents, assassination of opponents, murder of opponents, mass murder, rape, betrayal, (30
opponents from Khaibar invited to debate under promise of safe return – but 29 murdered on
the slightest excuse, the last one managed to flee), incitement to war – and lust for women and
for power. We have met Muslims excusing him with that he was a hard man living in a hard
time, and that he was no worse than other warlords. May be so, but he definitely was no
better either, and he pretended (?) to represent a good and benevolent god. Personally if
we meet a man – or a god – telling he is benevolent, but has harsh damands or deeds, we
any day and any hour believe his demands and deeds more than his words.
The last part of the quotation also tells volumes about Islam.
008 61/13: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -“. Permission to steal/rob, suppress, rape, enslave, keep
harems, murder, etc. which are central parts of the Quran – are those “Glad Tidings”? Direct
orders to go to war and kill and suppress and enslave and loot and destruct – – – and perhaps
become an invalid or dead, leaving your wife/wives widow(s) and your childten fatherless –
are those “Glad Tidings”? Direct orders to concentrate only on religious knowledge
(indirectly very clear in the Quran and directly and unmistakably very clear in Islam from
very early – and totally dominant from 1095 AD and al-Ghazali, “the Greatest Muslim after
Muhammad”) – are those “Glad Tidings”? Total destruction of all advanced countries and
cultures they met in Africa, Europe and Asia at least as far east as what was then India –
destruction it took the locals at least 200 years to overcome (if ever) – are those “Glad
Tidings”? The inhumanity in the war religion – are those “Glad Tidings”? The reduction of
women to third class citizens – if really citizens – (Islam’s claim that women were/are better
off under Islam than before only is true for some parts of what is now the Muslim area,
mainly in minor parts of Arabia – and even there it had not necessarily been true today if it
was not for the suppressing factor of Islam) – are those “Glad Tidings”? The enslavement and
suppression and mass murders/slaughtering of non-Muslims – were and are (see Muslims at
waging war and terror even today) those “Glad Tidings”? What a war religion did and does to
the societies and the personal soul – are those “Glad Tidings”? The suppression of thinking –
all non-religious philosophy, and all religious non-conform (to Islam) thinking – are those
“Glad Tidings”? Well, yes, for some Muslims – the ones of the warriors that survived in good
health and became rich from looting, and the ones of the leaders that became rich in wealth
and women from looting/slave taking and taxation plus became powerful, then and today.
And for some ones longing for a strict religion for psychological reasons.
**For everyone else it was everything from “Bad Tidings” to terror – and still is (just look at
the backward societies it resulted in once the riches from looting came to an end except where
they have natural resources to sell, like oil – and even worse when the sometimes hard
taxation or pogroms of non-Muslim underlings, reduced the number and/or economy of those
underlings = less tax possible. Look f. ex. at the development in India, China, Brazil of today
474
– especially India and China were far behind the Islamic countries 60 years ago, but what has
been happening during these years? Take away the oil, the money from outside the area
and the ideas from outside, more or less forced on the clergy and the leaders from media
and others – what has really happened in the Islamic area since f. ex.1950 compared to
many other places?
Yes: For everyone else it was and still is everything from “Bad Tidings” to terror.
For Muslims the part about heaven is “glad tidings” – if it is true. Also killing, rape,
enslaving, suppression and stealing are glad news for the right – or wrong – kind of Muslims.
The rest of the tidings is from bad to terror also for them – hate, war, suppression of women,
stagnant society, immoral moral, only religious knowledge really counts, servility under
authorities, fight and be killed, etc. Even for Muslims the claim that Islam is glad tidings
at best only is partly true – even if the religion should happen to be true.
And especially so if Islam is a made up religion. And even more so if there somewhere is a
true religion that Islam blocks its members from even looking for.
The very best one can say about the Quran and “Glad Tidings”, is that for some – some only –
parts of it partly were glad tidings, and that for some others parts of it bring peace to the soul
– like strong believers gain from ANY of the main religions.
***For all others – included the majority of Muslims – it was and is “Bad Tidings”. As
mentioned especially so if Islam is a made up religion. Which it seems to be from the proofs
of the Quran and the claims and the life of Muhammad. There are many more like this claim –
partly true for Muslims in a way, but terror for all others – in the Quran – f. ex. 2/119 – 17/9 –
33/45 – 33/47.
009 61/14a: “- – – said Jesus – – – to the Disciples,’ Who will be my helpers to (the work of)
Allah?’” See 61/6 + 61/6 (2 pieces).
010 61/14b: “Said the Disciples, ’We are Allah’s helpers”. See 61/6 + 61/6 (2 pieces).
Surah 61: At least 10 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 62:
001 62/1a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
002 62/1b: “(Allah*) – – – the Wise – – -*)”. Wrong if the Quran is representative for his
wisdom.
00a 62/2a: “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent (Muhammad*)”. It is difficult to believe that an
omniscient god sent a messenger with a message containing so much wrong, and a messenger
taking so good care of himself.
**00b 62/2b: “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent amongst the Unlettered a Messenger from
among themselves – – – “. All Muslim literature say Muhammad was analphabetic, and use
that for a proof for his inability to make up the Quran – not mentioning that many a good teller
of tales in the old times were analphabetic. But there also are two other possible meanings of
475
this verse: That his audience were unlettered persons (“- – – amongst the Unlettered – – -“), or
that they were persons without a holy book.
*As for Muhammads unability to trad: The statement is questioned: A man of good and not
too poor family not knowing how to read and write? A rich widow marrying an analphabetic,
knowing he was to run her business? An intelligent businessman with admission to learned
men, with a drive for power, not learning how to read and write? It is not likely – but there are
no neutral sources about Muhammad from that time. It will never be possible to find out for
sure, one way or the other.
003 62/2c: “- – – His (Allah’s*) Signs – – -.” There are no signs clearly from Allah neither in
the Quran, nor any other place. See 2/99.
**004 62/2d: “(Muhammad was to*) instruct them (the Unlettered Arabs*) in Scripture and
Wisdom – – -” To instruct them in scripture, he hardly could be an analphabetic himself, but
that aside: See 40/75 and 41/12.
005 62/3: “- – – (Allah is*) Wise – – -”. See 61/1 + 40/75 + 41/12.
006 62/5: “- – – the Signs of Allah – – -.” See 62/2 and 2/99 above.
007 62/6: “- – – then express your desire for Death, if ye are truthful!” An impossible demand
for pious Jews and Christians: For one thing life has its values for everybody. More essential
for them: Life is a gift from Yahweh/God – to wish to end it is to diminish a gift from Him.
Most serious: To (wish to) end your own life, is a sin so grave that it automatically sends
you to Hell.
Any god had known this – Muhammad obviously not. Then who made the Quran? (In a way
worse: Muslim scholars today know this fact. But they never mention it, in spite of using
this argument. Dishonesty.)
008 62/8: “- – – ye will be sent back to the Knower of things (Allah*) – – -”. As for “the
Knower“: See 61/1 + 40/75 + 41/12.
Surah 62: At least 8 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 63:
00a 63/1: “- – – thou (Muhammad*) art indeed His (Allah’s*) Messenger – – -.” Well, the
Quran says so – but very much of what is said in the Quran obviously is wrong. And can a
man claiming to bringing ok messages for 12 years and then highly immoral and
inhuman messages for 10 years (Islam changed much in and after 622 AD and the flight
to Medina) to man – and using the messages as his platform of power – really be the
messenger of a timeless and benevolent god?
001 63/4: “How are they (non-Muslims*) deluded (away from the Truth)!” At very best away
from partly truths – see 40/75 and 41/12. (But there is an impolite thought far behind in our
brain: Who are really deluded when it comes to Islam? – the ones just listening to the imams
without using their knowledge and their brain and asking no questions, or the other ones?)
476
002 63/7: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
Surah 63: At least 2 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 64:
001 64/1: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
002: 64/2 “- – – it is He (Allah*) Who has created you – – -”. According to science man was
not created, but evolved from an earlier primate. At least man cannot have been created in
more than one of the 13 different ways in which the Quran tells the single person Adam was
created – see 6/2.
003 64/3: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
004 64/4a: “He (Allah*) knows what is in the heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth – – -”.
According to the Quran, he knows only parts of it – see 40/75 and 41/12.
005 64/4b: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
006 64/6: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. See 2/99.
**007 64/7: “The Unbelievers think that they will not be raised up (after this life*)”. Wrong.
Islam wants to be a religion for the entire world, and most religions it met and meets have a
second life. But what was difficult for the old Arabs to accept, was that Muhammad told that
not only your soul – or something similar – was to be resurrected, but your complete and exact
body and mental self, except that you are to be resurrected as a young and good-looking
person – there is said nothing about people born with mental or physical handicaps, or
babies/children in this connection. (There is one inconsistence, though: 2-3 places the Quran
tells that your women in Paradise will be of “suitable age” – f. ex. 78/33. Why? – if everyone
will be young and then of roughly the same age?) If bodily resurrection is believable or not,
anyone will have to decide for himself or herself.
008 64/8a: “Believe, therefore, in Allah and His Messenger, and in the Light (the Quran*) – – –
”. As for the Light, see 40/75 and 41/12. As For believing: See all the mistakes,
contradictions, invalid claims/logic, etc. – not to mention highly immoral laws that are not
made by any benevolent god.
009 64/8b: “- – – the Light (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) Have sent down.” See 41/12 +
40/75.
010 64/10: “- – – Our (Allah’s) Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
011 64/18: “- – – (Allah is*) Full of Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12.
Surah 64: At least 11 mistakes.
SURAH 65:
001 65/1: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of
a prophet is a person that:
477
1. Have the gift of and close enough connection
to a god for making eal prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least
mostly come true. (If not he is a false
prophet.)
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential
prophesies, that it is a clear part of his
mission.
A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things
through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this
is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that
anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention
pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented
that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and
Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”
– prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles
connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a
and 30/46a.
Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or
something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed”
that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.
00a 65/7: “Allah puts no burden on any person beyond what He has given him.” Well, there
are people in Muslim countries, too, that cannot bear the burdens and flee – to other places or
even from this life.
**002 65/11: “- – – the Signs of Allah (are*) containing clear explanations – – -”. Wrong.
There is not one single of the “Signs” referred in the Quran, that has any value, neither
as proof nor as explanation for a god or for a messenger (with the possible exception of
some taken from the Bible, but they talk about another god, Yahweh). The reasons are that
they without exception just are loose statements or are building on other invalid claims
or statements, “signs“ or “proofs” – totally invalid. A proof after all is “one or more
proven facts that can give only one conclution”. If a person consciously uses such invalid
arguments, they are using hallmarks of a cheat and a deceiver. No god would use them.
**003 65/12a: “Allah is He Who created seven Firmaments – – -”. Firmament is another name
for the heaven as we see it – mostly used about the night sky. The Quran so many places states
there are 7 heavens or firmaments or tracts or just heavens in plural (at least 199 places in the
Quran) referring to the 7 heavens, that there is no doubt what it means. It is totally wrong,
though. (Even if Muslims try to explain it away with 7 layers in the atmosphere or diffuse
arguments about the space as we know it today or statements about it being an allegory – the
standard last resort for Muslims for explaining or “explaining” things that are impossible to
explain – even though it very clearly is no allegory – clear at least to anyone not full of wishful
thinking or religious inhibitions.
*** 004 65/12b: “Allah is He Who created seven Firmaments (wrong*) and of the earth a
similar number”. According to Hadith the last part means 7 seperate Earths – one above the
other. According to Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah al-Kisa’I the last part means 7 layers down in
478
the Earth according to one “explanation”. But what the Quran really says, is 7 Earths – 7 flat
Earths. No matter if you believe the Quran/Hadith or one of the “explanations” for this
somewhat special geology/astronomy, the names of the “Earths” from top and down are:
1. Ramaka,
2. Khalada,
3. Arqa,
4. Haraba,
5. Maltham,
6. Sijjin,
7. Ajiba.
According to f. ex Al-Bukhari they are placed one above the other – easy as the Quran
tells the Earth(s) is/are flat. The lower down, the more devilish life on the respective layer –
and if you are a big enough sinner, you can fall down through them. It is not necessary to say
it is all rubbish.
005 65/12c: “- – – Allah comprehends all things in (His) Knowledge.” See 40/75 and 41/12.
Surah 65: At least 5 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 66:
001 66/1: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of
a prophet is a person that:
1. Have the gift of and close enough connection
to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least
mostly come true.(If not he is a false prophet).
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential
prophesies, that it is a clear part of his
mission.
A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things
through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this
is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that
anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention
pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented
that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and
Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”
– prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles
connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a
and 30/46a.
Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or
something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed”
that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.
002 66/2: “- – – He (Allah*) is full of Knowledge and Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12.
479
003 66/3: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -.” Wrong. See 66/1 above.
004 66/6: “- – – a fire whose fuel is Men and Stones – – -“. A fire is a chemical reaction –
normally an oxidation – that releases heat, and so much heat that the reaction continues by
itself and still releases enough surplus heath to make a visible flame. This does not happen
with stones – and definitely not with the stones Muhammad and his congregation knew about.
(There are Muslims telling Muhammad meant coal, but coal as a means of heating, was
unknown in Arabia at the time of Muhammad and his congregation – which means it is very
clear that his followers were meant to understand normal stones). Wrong.
005 66/8: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -.” Wrong. See 66/1 above.
006 66/9: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” Wrong. See 66/1 above.
00a 66/11: The wife of the Pharaoh (Ramses II) is indicated to be a strongly believing
Muslim. Now a pharaoh normally had a number of wives – and a mighty one like Ramses II
not least (it is known he had 67 sons, but we have not seen the number of wives). They may
have had different religions – especially the possible ones not born in Egypt. But it is utterly
unknown to science that one of them can have been a Muslim 2000 years before Muhammad.
Actually – and in spite of the Quran’s and of Islam’s repeated claims of being an age-old
religion, science has found not one single trace of a religion like Islam anywhere or any time
before 610 AD when Muhammad started his mission – and of really monotheistic religions
only the Mosaic (Jewish), the Christian, and to a degree the Zoroastrians in Persia (+ the
episode with the sun god of Akn Aton and the small monotheistic sect in Arabia, most likely
inspired by the Jews and the Christians). Islam has to bring proofs.
**007 66/12: “And Mary the daughter of ‘Imran – – -”. Once more this famous mistake.
Imran was the father of Moses and Aaron – – – but they lived (if they are not fiction) some
1200 years before Mary, mother of Jesus. The pharaoh of Moses f. ex. was Ramses II
according to science, and we know when he lived. Muslims try to explain this with that it was
another Imran, but science agrees on that it is the same one, and that Muhammad here made a
genuine mistake. This even more so as Hadith shows that Muhammad later was told about his
mistake, and tried to “explain” it away, but without success.
Surah 66: At least 7 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 67:
****001 67/3a: “He (Allah*) Who created the seven heavens one above another – – -”. It is
hardly possible to state the Quran’s picture of our sky more accurately and clearly than
this. Neither is possible to be much more wrong, especially when we add that according to
the Quran the heavens are held up by invisible pillars, that the heavens are made from
something material (if not you could build them and not fasten the stars, etc. to them), that the
stars are fixed to the lowest heaven with the sun (?) and the moon between the heavens, and
that the stars also double as shooting stars to chase away spying bad spirits. See 67/5a and
67/b below. Who composed the Quran – a god or someone not omniscient?
002 67/3b: “- – – seest thou any flaws (in Allah’s creation of heaven*)?” See 50/6.
480
****003 67/5a: “And We (Allah*) have (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with
Lamps (Stars*)- – -”. The Quran’s picture of cosmos is taken from Greek and/or Persian
astronomy, and as any secondary school child not blinded by religious indoctrination can see;
it is much wrong. For one thing the heavens have to be made from something material to
make possible fixing the stars to one of them. Besides: From Greek etc. astronomy we know
that the planets, stars, sun and moon were fixed to 7 different heavens. As the stars according
to the Quran is fixed to the lowest, they have to be lover than the than the moon. But what
happens if you try to place say Betelgeuse or even Helios – our sun – below Luna – our moon?
Further: Our rockets cannot go too high – they will collide with the material heavens.
Muhammad said the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. The Quran says the
Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. Islam says the Quran is perfect and without
mistakes or flaws. Muslims say the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. All of
them say the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws because Allah sent down a book
he had made or which had existed forever – a book which is the revered “Mother Book” (f. ex.
43/4) in the heaven of Allah – and an omniscient god can neither make mistakes nor revere
texts containing lots of mistakes, contradictions, flaws and hallmarks of cheats and deceivers.
Also see 67/3 above and 67/5 just below.
BUT WHAT DO ALL THOSE WORDS HELP WHEN THE MISTAKES,
CONTRADICTIONS, AND THE FLAWS ARE THERE ANYHOW? AND WHEN
ISLAM TELLS THAT THE TOTAL LACK OF ANY MISTAKE IN THE QURAN
PROVES IT IS FROM ALLAH, WHAT THEN DOES MEGA BLUNDERS LIKE
THIS PROVE?
***004 67/5b: “- – -and We (Allah*) have made such (lamps (stars*) as) missiles to drive
away the Evil Ones – – -”. Well, well. Any secondary school child IS able to see that this entry
from the same verse above, was wrong, he would laugh from this: Stars fastened to the lowest
heaven and then doubling as shooting stars to drive away bad spirits or jinns!! Also see 67/3.
No further comments. And none necessary,
*** 005 67/10: “Had we (non-Muslims*) but listened or used our intelligence – – -”. Islam
often tries to tell that it is intelligence that makes Muslims believe, or intelligence that is
necessary to see from the Quran that it is a work from a god. What at least is sure, is that
anyone who uses his intelligence and has a reasonable minimum of knowledge of f. ex.
history, geography, astronomy, archaeology, etc. will find a lot of mistakes in the Quran – if
he not for some reason is blind or do not want to see. Also: If he knows a very small
minimum of logic and the rules for using logic and for evaluating information, he has to see
the lose statements, the invalid “signs” and the as invalid “proofs” – and may be he will be
struck by the thought: Who uses this kind of arguments, except one who has no real
arguments, and therefore has to cheat and deceive – f. ex. to gain followers and power?
006 67/13: “He (Allah*) certainly has (full) knowledge – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
**007 67/19: “None can hold them (the birds*) up except (Allah) – – -”. Wrong. What keep
the birds up, are the laws of aerodynamics. (Of course Muslims can use one of their favourite
last resorts: Declare that Allah made those laws. But then they will have to prove that – not
just use cheap words that any priest in any religion can use about any god.) Also see 16/79.
481
008 67/21: “- – – flight (from the Truth).” See 40/75 and 41/12.
Surah 67: At least 8 mistakes.
SURAH 68:
***001 68/4: “And thou (Muhammad or Muslims*) (standest) on an exalted standard of
character – – -”. Well:
Seen in the Quran and the Hadiths:
1. Lots of mistaken facts, and other mistakes.
Not typical for an omniscient god.
2. Lots of invalid arguments – hallmarks for
cheaters and deceivers.
3. Lots of “signs” – all invalid as proofs for
Allah or for Muhammad’s connection to a
god.
4. A numger of “proofs” – all invalid as proofs
for Allah or for Muhammad’s connection to a
god. A few of the “proofs” even are
scientifically wrong. Hallmarks for cheats,
swindlers, and desceivers.
5. A man gluing himself to his god and his
religion – his platform of power.
6. A prophet that in reality was no prophet – he
had not the gift of prophesying. Muhammad
did not even pretend or claim to have that
gift, he just “borrowed” the distinguished
title. (A few things he said, came true – but
they were not given as prophesies.) A
messenger ok – for someone or something or
for himself – an apostle for the same, ok. But
a person that does not have the gift of
prophesying, is not a real prophet –
Muhammad just “borrowed” an imposing
title. Islam also claims that messenger is a
more distinguished title prophet – but the title
just means “one who is not implicated, but
just brings messages from one or more to one
or more others”. He does not even have to
understand whet things really are about.
Besides: Why did Muhammad borrow the
title “prophet” if the title “messenger” had
been more distinguished? – simply because a
prophet is something more: Messages like a
messenger + prophesies – – – if it is a real
prophet.
7. A messenger being the chief of highwaymen
from Yathrib/Medina – even in holy months.
482
8. A messenger also living from extortion –
(money for men kidnapped from f. ex.
caravans).
9. A messenger whose due was 100% of the
robbed things if the victim gave in without a
fight (albeit not all for personal use).
10. A messenger permitting to take “spoils of
war” – and 20% for him (albeit not all for
himself).
11. A messenger permitting to take slaves – and
20%for him (albeit not all for personal use).
12. A messenger who received ca. 2.5% (from
0% to 10 %) of what you owned each and
every year (if you were not too poor) – for the
poor, but also for war and for “gifts” to attract
followers, etc.
13. A messenger using betrayal (f. ex. promise of
safe return of a 30 strong delegation from
Khaybar broken and 29 of them murdered).
14. A messenger with special agreement with the
god for having many women.
15. A messenger teaching hate against nonfollowers.
16. A messenger teaching and inciting war
against non-followers.
17. A messenger personally raping female
prisoners/slaves.
18. A messenger and his men – all with
permission from their god to rape any female
prisoner or slave that was not pregnant. It was
“god and lawful”.
19. A messenger that initiated assassinations of
opponents.
20. A messenger that initiated murders on
opponents.
21. A messenger that initiated mass murder.
22. A messenger teaching suppression of women
and non-followers.
23. A messenger with lust for power (easy to see
from f. ex. Hadith, but even more so from f.
ex. the way he glues himself to his platform
of power, his god, also in the Quran).
And not least: All this is from Muslim sources – what Islam itself tells about him, though in
more glossy words. There is no excuse for becoming angry, because it is 100% true according
to Islam itself.
Yes, many will call that “an exalted standard of character”. But not many of those would
be non-Muslims. And how many of the Muslims can say it and fell honest?
483
002 68/7: “- – – those (Muslims*) who receive (true) Guidance (the contents of the Quran*) – –
-”. Can the Quran with all its mistakes deliver true guidance? See 40/75 and 41/12.

003 68/8: “So hearken not to those who deny (the Truth).” See 40/75 and 41/12.
004 68/15: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
005 68/52: “- – – all the Worlds.” Once more a reference to the 7 (flat) worlds of Muhammad.
Wrong. See 65/12b above.
Surah 68: At least 5 mistakes.
SURAH 69:
001 69/9+10: “And Pharaoh, and those before him – – – (Allah*) punished them with an
abundant Penalty.” The Quran tells that this penalty for the pharaoh was drowning, but
Ramses II did not drown. Neither did he die until several years after the possible exodus,
according to science.
002 69/16: “And the sky will be rent asunder – – -”. How do you rip asunder vacuum and open
space?
003 69/43a: “(This (the Quran*) is) a Message sent down from the Lord (Allah*)”of the
Worlds (Allah*).” Must be wrong. See 41/12 and 40/75. No omniscient god makes or revere
or forward in his own name a book with so much wrong.
004 69/43b: “- – – the Worlds – – -.” But the 7 worlds of Muhammad do not exist. See 65/12b.
00a 69/44 – 46: “And if the Messenger (Muhammad*) were to invent any sayings in our
name, We (Allah*) should certainly size him by his right hand, and We should certainly then
cut off the artery of his heart”. Not if you – Allah – does not exist. Nor if you are far from
omnipotent if you exist.
**005 69/50: “But truly (Revelation (of the Quran*) is a cause of sorrow for the
Unbelievers”. True, but for wrong reasons: Because of all the war and blood and terror Islam
has represented through the ages – and the answer is NOT that also other religions have
caused wars, etc. as that does not make a hate, rape, suppression, robbery and blood religion
like Islam one single iota better – and in most other religions it is done in spite of the real
religion, not because of. And because many felt pity for souls going lost in a religion built on
a book where something is seriously wrong. (May be their own religion(s) also were wrong,
but all the mistaken facts, etc., in a book pretending to be from an omniscient god, proves that
in Islam there really is something that is wrong – and it makes one doubt very strongly that it
really is a divine revelation.
Actually Islam is the only one of the big religions that directly proves itself – by means of
their holy book – that it is something seriously wrong with the holy book and thus with the
religion.
006 69/51: “But, verily; it is Truth of assured certainty“. Hardly – but words are cheap. See
40/75 and 41/12 – – – and others.
484
Surah 69: At least 6 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 70:
00a 70/4a: “The angels and the Spirit (“ruh” in the Arab text) – – -.” The word “ruh” is used a
few times in the Arab text – at least in 16/2, 78/38, 97/4 and here. It really means “the Spirit”
or “the Holy Spirit”, but is f. ex. in 16/2 given another translation (“inspiration”). A number
of Muslims wants it to be another name for the angel Gabriel (simply because it was he who
was said to bring down the surahs to Muhammad, and it is said a couple of places that the
“ruh” – the Spirit or Holy Spirit – brought down such ones, “ergo” the Holy Spirit = the angel
Gabriel). But the logic is not correct – by means of the rules of logical deductions it is
possible only to say they may be the same. And here is another piece of information that
makes that deduction unlikely or impossible: The “ruh” – the Holy Spirit” – is not included
among the angels. Neither is it the other places – which makes it highly unlikely logically that
the Holy Spirit = the angel Gabriel. (In the Bible it is clear they are not the same).
001 70/4b: “- – – in a Day the measure whereof is (as) fifty thousand years – – -.” A solid
contradiction to 32/5 and 22/47 which both say 1000 years.
002 70/39: “For We (Allah*) have created them (humans*) out of (base matter) they know! “
Man was not created; he evolved from an earlier primate. Any god had known. Also see 6/2 –
Adam could not be created in a dozen different ways.
Surah 70: At least 2 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 71:
0a *71/6: “- – – (the non-Muslim’s*) flight (from the Right (Islam*)).” Can a religion building
on the Quran with all its mistakes, contradictions, etc., be the right one? See 40/75 and 41/12?
There is good reason for doubt. And if Islam is a made up religion like so many others –
what then with all Muslims if there exists another one which is right and there is a next
world? – – – and they are blocked from looking for it.
***001 71/15a: “- – – Allah has created the seven heavens one above another – – -”. See 67/3a,
67/3b, 67/5a and 67/5b above.
002 71/16: “And made the moon a lamp in their (the heavens’) midst – – -.” The moon is not
in the midst of the 7 heavens (see 71/15a just above) of Muhammad. Any god – even baby god
– had known, Muhammad not. Who made the Quran?
**003 71/19: “And Allah has made the earth for you as a carpet (spread) out.” The Quran
describes the Earth flat – may be round like a disc, but flat. Wrong. (Similar description in
15/19, 20/53, 43/10, 79/30, 88/70).
Surah 71: At least 3 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 72:
**00a 72/3: “- – – He (Allah*) has taken neither a wife nor a son.” If Allah is not the same god
as Yahweh, this may be true. But if the two are the same: Well, Jesus called him “father”
many times and in front of thousands of witnesses. And as for a wife: In the really old Hebrew
485
religion the god had a female companion – his Amat (source: New Scientist and others). But
in the very male culture she was forgotten.
*001 72/8: “We (jinns – a being “borrowed” from pagan Arab religion, legends and fairy
tales*) pried into the secrets of heaven, but we found it filled with stern guides and flaming
fires.” The Quran tells that Allah use the stars like shooting stars – flaming fire – to chase
away bad spirits amd jinns wanting to spy on heaven. No comments should be necessary.
002 72/9: “- – – flaming fire – – -.” See 72/8 just above.
003 72/13: “- – – listened to the Guidance (of the Quran*) – – -”. As for guidance from the
Quran: See 41/12 and 40/75.
Surah 72: At least 3 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 73:
001 73/11: “- – – deny the Truth (of the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
00a 73/15: “We have sent to you (O men!) a Messenger (Muhammad*) – – -”. Would an
omniscient god send a messenger teaching a religion containing lots of mistakes and lots of
hallmarks of a cheat and a deceiver? Islam will have to prove it – not only the usual
undocumented claims.
002 73/16: “- – – We (Allah*) sized him (Ramses II*) with a heavy Punishment – – -”. For one
thing: It is likely Ramses II got no personal punishment – he died years later. For another: We
know from the Quran that the punishment was drowning – but Ramses II did not drown.
Wrong.
003 73/18: “- – – the sky will be cleft asunder – – -.” How can vacuum be cleft asunder?
Surah 73: At least 3 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
SURAH 74:
001 74/16: “- – – Our (Allah’s) Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
002 74/56: “He (Allah*) is the Lord of Righteousness – – -.” A Lord making laws that f. ex.
say that killing and raping and stealing are “right and good”, and who says that a
woman shall be strictly punished for indecency if she is raped and cannot bring 4 male
witnesses to the very act, is not righteous – on the contrary: He belongs to the most
inhuman, worst and most unjust beings in all the universe. The last mentioned law – about
the raped woman – is among the very most unjust laws that have ever existed (may be
together with the law that says that stealing/robbing, extortion and killing in jihad –
everything is jihad – is “good and lawful”), especially as Allah (if he exists and is omniscient)
knows she is not guilty. On many points the opposite of benevolent.
Surah 74: At least 2 mistakes.
SURAH 75:
486
**001 75/8+9: “(The day when*) the moon is buried in darkness, And the sun and the moon
are joined together – – -”. This is physically impossible the first some 5 billion years. And the
day it may become possible, the Paradise as described in the Quran is not longer possible.
Because – and not least: That day the moon will not be buried in darkness, but in intense light
– and a day of doom and Paradise like described in the Quran will be impossible. That day
both the Earth and the moon are buried inside the sun – if that happens (science is not quite
sure the sun will balloon enough). But in any case the hugely swollen sun will make any place
inside Jupiter too hot for a paradise on Earth or in the heaven over/around Earth – the Quran
places Paradise there under a benign and everlasting sun. Also everlasting will be impossible
and wrong, because science tells that in some 5 billion years the Earth either is inside the
giant swollen, red (not yellow any more) sun, and sporting ca. 2000 – 3000 centigrades, or just
above the then giant star and with a temperature of some 2ooo – 3000 degrees centigrade –
hotter than in the flames of the Muslim Hell.
002 75/32: “- – – he rejected Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
003 75/37: “Was he not a drop of sperm – – -?” No. He simply “was” not until a sperm cell
and an egg cell had fused together. Any god knew this – Muhammad not. Sperm is no seed to
plant in a woman to start growing like a pip of an orange.
Surah 75: At least 3 mistakes.
SURAH 76:
001 76/2: “Verily, We (Allah*) created man from a drop of mingled sperm – – -.” Wrong.
Neither man (see 6/2 and 75/37 just above), nor a man (see 75/37) was made only from
sperm.
*002 76/13: “- – – (the moon’s) excessive cold.” The moon often is up at night. Clear nights –
when you can see the moon – often are very cold in deserts like in Arabia. But the cold is not
because of the moon – that is just a coincidence because of a clear sky. It is cold because Earth
radiates its heath to space – something Muhammad could not know, but any god had known it.
Who composed the Quran?
003 76/16: “- – – Crystal clear, made of silver – – -.” This must be a mistake somehow – even
Muhammad knew that something made from silver cannot be clear – transparent – like
crystal. But if f. ex. Caliph Uthman made a mistake here when creating the official Quran,
then how many more mistakes did he or others make?
004 76/21: “- – – and they will (in Paradise*) be adorned with bracelets of silver – – -.” Well, in
18/31 – 35/33 the bracelets are from gold. A small detail – but an omniscient god does not get
even the details wrong. A mistake and a small contradiction.
005 76/23: “It’s We (Allah*) Who have sent down the Quran – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
006 76/30: “- – – Allah is full of knowledge and Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12.
Surah 76: At least 6 mistakes.
SURAH 77:
487
001 77/9: “- – – When the heaven is cleft asunder – – -.” How can vacuum be cleft asunder?
002 77/15: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
003 77/19: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
004 77/20: “Have We (Allah*) not created you from a fluid (sperm) – – -?” No. See 75/37.
005 77/24: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
006 77/28: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
007 77/34: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
008 77/37: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
009 77/40: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
010 77/45: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
011 77/47: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
012 77/49: “- – – Rejecters of Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
Surah 77: At least 12 mistakes.
SURAH 78:
001 78/6: “Have We (Allah*) not made the earth a wide expanse – – -?” We know from other
places in the Quran that this expanse is flat, and may be round like a disk. But Earth is a
sphere.
00a 78/7: “(Allah made*) the mountains as pegs – – -“. Some Muslims say: Hip, hurray – here
is a proof for Muhammad and the Quran: The science talks about the “roots” of the mountains
– the mountains are like pegs! How could Muhammad know?! But mountain “roots” are not
like pegs, but like bulges or distorted sheets (as mountains often are long and narrow – look at
the chain Rocky Mountains + Andes f. ex.) or as distorted hemisphere. There exist deep pegs
– or really sheets – pointing far down into the mantel (melted stone), but not in connection to
mountains or mountain ranges really, though they may co-exist: They exist some places
where large pieces of the Earth’s crust – tectonic plates – are forced downwards because of
movements of the crust (tectonic movement). But that has nothing to do with mountains (even
though mountains may be secondary results of the movement) – it is something entirely
different.
*002 78/12a: “And (have We (Allah*) not) built over you – – – firmaments – – -?” For
something to be built, materials have to be used – the heavens also from other pieces of
information must be made from something material. Wrong: The sky as we see it, just is an
optical illusion – or actually 2.
488
*003 78/12b: “And (have We (Allah*) not) built over you the seven firmaments – – -?”
Wrong: See 67/3 a, 67/3b, 67/5a and 67/5b. Simply and doubly wrong.
00b 78/12-13: “And have We (Allah*) not built over you the seven firmaments, and placed
(therein) a light of Splendour (= the sun*)?” The sun is not placed among (“therein”) the 7
firmaments.
004 78/19a: “And the heavens (plural and wrong*) shall be opened as if there were doors – – –
”. There is nothing to open in open space.
005 78/19b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
006 78/28: “- – – Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
007 78/37: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
Surah: At least 7 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.
SURAH 79:
001 79/24: “(Pharaoh Ramses II*) Saying: ‘I am your Lord (in this connection: Your god*),
most High’”. The pharaoh was not the “most high” god in the old Egypt.
002 79/25: “But Allah did punish him (Pharaoh Ramses II*) – – -”. Wrong. We know from
other places in the Quran that the punishment is said to be drowning. But for one thing
Ramses II did not die by drowning, and for another thing: He only died years later.
003 79/28: “On high hath He (Allah*) raised its (heaven’s*) canopy – – -”. Heaven is no
canopy. See 67/3a. 67/3b, 67/5a and 67/5b.
*004 79/30: “And the earth, moreover, hath He (Allah*) extended to a wide expense – – -”.
See 78/6. As this is one of the last places in the Quran where the Earth’s form is indicated
(flat), we may add that you will meet Muslims that insists that it is egg-shaped. This is taken
from one of the translators that even Islam reckons not to be an outstanding one, Rashad
Khalifa. He translates that the Earth is egg shaped. But the Arab original speaks about the
ground that the ostrich flattens before it lays its egg = a flat area. Instead the clever Mr.
Rashad Khalifa talks about the egg – and egg shaped!! And as this fits reality in a way (Earth
in reality is a slightly flattened sphere – 21 km shorter diameter between the poles than at
equator (an egg is the opposite) and with an ever so slight pear-shape) – though not the Quran
– this mistaken translation often is quoted. (You never find that translation from a good
translator).
Surah 79: At least 4 mistakes.
SURAH 80:
695 80/19: “From a sperm-drop He (Allah*) hath created him (man*) – – -”. Wrong. Neither
man (see 6/2) nor a man (see 75/37) was created just from sperm.
Surah 80: At least 1 mistake.
489
Sub-total till here: At least 1739 mistakes + 212 likely mistakes.
PART II, CHAPTER 1, Subchapter 4, Section 8 (= II-1-4-8)
MISTAKES AND ERRORS – MISTAKEN FACTS – IN THE QURAN, THE
HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. THE
“COMPLETE” LIST – THE “ENCYCLOPAEDIA” – BASED ON SURAH
AND VERSE NUMBER
(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 – 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS,
CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT
SOMETHING IS WRONG – NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)
For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3,
Sections 1 through 16.
SOME CLEAR FACT MISTAKES AND
ERRORS IN SURAHS 81 THROUGH 114
IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY BOOK OF
MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND
ALLAH
Comments numbered by 3 numbers (included 00 or 0) a few places followed by one small
letter = clear mistakes. Comments numbered by 00 or 0 followed by 1, 2 or 3 letters (big or
small) = likely mistake.
SURAH 81:
001 81/1: “When the sun (with its spacious light) is folded up – – -.” A solid sphere cannot be
folded up – it can become dark (in many billion years), which may be the underlying
meaning, but it cannot be folded up. It seems that Muhammad believed the sun was a flat disc.
Any god had known better.
002 81/1+ 4 + 5: “When the sun (with its spacious light) is folded up (becomes dark*) – – – the
she-camels, 10 months with young, are left untended (and*) When the wild beasts are herded
together (in human habitations) – – -”. In some 5 billion years the sun will become a red giant,
according to science. The Earth will either be swallowed by it or circle just above its surface.
If Earth survives, it will then have a surface temperature of some 2ooo+ C as the surface of a
red giant is 2000-3000 centigrades – and all camels, wild beasts and humans will be gone
billions of years before. The Earth itself will only be dry cinder. From then it will take many
billions of years before the sun becomes dark (it will not go nova as it is too small by a factor
of ca. 12 – it will become dark). Very wrong time factor. Any god had known.
003 81/2: “When (at the Last Day*) the stars (here it is talk about the real stars, not shooting
stars*) fall (on Earth*), loosing their lustre – – -”. The stars cannot fall on earth – never
490
according to science and according to reality. Theoretically Earth can fall into the sun – and
may do so in 5 billion years time – but not “vica versa” (it will be the Earth that really moves,
not the sun).
004 81/19: “Verily, this is the word of a most honourable Messenger (Muhammad*) – – -.” If a
man that is a thief/robber, extorter, womanizer, child molester (Aishah through many years
from she was 9 years old), rapist, betrayer, torturer, murderer, mass murderer, war monger
and more is a “most honourable Messenger” – – – well, in that case we will not like to meet a
normal messenger, not to mention an unhonourable one. It may seem that Islam have a
somewhat special standard for ethics and moral.
005 81/27: “- – – the Worlds – – -.” Well, the 7 (flat) worlds of Muhammad simply never are
found by science. See 65/12b.
006 81/29: “- – – the Worlds – – -.” See 81/27 just above and 56/12b.
SURAH 82:
001 82/1: “When the Sky is cleft asunder – – -.” How can vacuum be cleft asunder?
SURAH 83:
001 83/6: “- – – the Worlds – – -.” See 81/27 above.
002 83/13: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -.” There exists no sign clearly from Allah, neither in
the Quran, nor anywhere else. And see 2/99.
SURAH 84:
001 84/1: “When the Sky is rent asunder – – -.” Vacuum cannot be rent asunder. Any god had
known.
***002 84/15+16: “For his Lord (Allah*) was ever watchful of him (non-Muslim*)! So I
(Muhammad*) do call to witness the ruddy glow of Sunset – – -”. A serious one – here it once
more is Muhammad who is speaking – in what is said to be the copy of the Mother Book
(43/4) in Heaven, made of Allah and existed from eternity. How is that possible?
003 84/23: “But Allah is full of Knowledge – – -.” Not if the Quran is representative for that
knowledge.
SURAH 85:
001 85/9: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.
002 85/19: “- – – rejecting (the Truth) (the Quran*)!” See 40/75 and 41/12.
*003 85/21: “- – – a Glorious Quran – – -”. A book with that many mistakes, contradictions,
and other hallmarks of cheating and deceiving is not very glorious. Also see 40/75 and
41/12.
Surah 81 – 85: At least 15 mistakes.
491
SURAH 86:
001 86/6: “He (man*) is created from a drop (of sperm*) emitted – – -”. See 80/19 + 6/2.
**002 86/6+7: “He (man*) is created from a drop (of sperm*) emitted – Proceeding from
between the backbone and the ribs.” Glorious: Muhammad did not even know that sperm
comes from the testes – the “stones” – and placed the source inside the body and half a meter
too high up!!!! And a place where it is too hot for production of semen. (The testes are in
scrotum outside the main body because it needs slightly under body temperature to be able to
produce semen). It is in accordance with Greek medicine – Hippocrates f. ex. thought the
sperm passed through the kidneys. Even a baby god knows better. Who composed the
Quran? And what is Islam – and it’s Muslims – if the Quran is faked?
SURAH 87:
001 87/3: “- – – and granted guidance (the Quran*) – – -”. There is little reliable guidance in a
book full of mistakes and hallmarks of cheating and deceiving. See 40/75 and 41/12.
*002 87/19: “The Books of Abraham – – – ”. Abraham had no books according to science –
and definitely not in plural. Besides a nomad of 4000 years ago, hardly knew how to read.
(There exists, though, “The Testament of Abraham” – a very much made up (apocryphal)
scripture.)
SURAH 88:
001 88/20: “And at the earth, how it is spread out?” – the flat Earth is indicated again. See
79/30 and others above.
SURAH 89 – 90:
001 90/19: “- – – Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.
Surah 86 – 90: At least 6 mistakes.
SURAH 91:
001 91/2: “By the Moon as she (the moon*) follows him (the sun*)”. The moon does not
follow the sun – it only looks like that as seen from the Earth. Does Allah live on Earth? At
least it seems like the maker of the Quran did so.
*002 91/4: “By the Night as it conceals it (the sun*)”. The night does not conceal the sun –
there is night because the Earth makes a shade. It is 180 degrees different from what
Muhammad told: There is night because the night conceals the sun. Any god knew that.
Besides: The night simply is lack of sunlight – it is physically impossible for the night to
conceal the sun. Any god had known that, too. Then who made the Quran?
003 91/6 “By the Earth and its (wide) expanse – – -”. The Earth is no wide expanse (it is
known from other places in the Quran that Earth is a wide, flat expanse), but a sphere.
SURAH 92:
492
**001 92/1: “By (start of an oath*) the Night as it conceals (the light) – – -”. Wrong – it is
Earth that conceals the light and causes the night. Any deity knows this – Muhammad not.
(See 91/4).
*002 92/3: “By (the mystery of) the creation of male and female – – -”. No mystery for us, no
mystery for a god – a large mystery for Muhammad. (According to Hadith he thought that if
the woman climaxed first, it became a girl, but if the man climaxed first, it became a boy –
and boys of course were best.) Who made the Quran?
003 92/16: “- – – Truth (the Quran) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
SURAH 93 – 94 – 95:
**001 95/4: “We (Allah*) have indeed created man in the best of moulds”. Wrong – and it
tells something that the Quran strengthens (with the word “indeed”) a statement – a loose one
as so often – that is wrong. Man is far from made in the best of moulds. Many “construction
details” could have been better – our ability to stand wear and tear f. ex., and our ability to see
in the dark, and more. Also our ability to tackle illnesses is far from perfect – and if our brain
could think of more than one thing at a time, we would be more efficient. Etc., etc., etc.
Surah 91 – 95: At least 7 mistakes.
SURAH 96:
**001 96/2: “(Allah*) Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood – – -”. Neither
man (see 6/2) nor a man (see 75/37) was made out of blood – congealed or not – even though
some of the old Greeks believed so, and from whom Muhammad may have stolen this idea.
But the start of a human or an animal – the sperm cell and the egg cell and then the zygote –
are so small that it is not to be seen with your eyes only, in the blood and gore in a carcass or
in a slaughtered animal. Muhammad believed that the semen was a seed which planted in a
woman grew into a clot of blood that grew into a foetus. It may be worth mentioning that the
statement in this verse, is like Aristotle’s theory. But any god had known better. Who
composed the Quran? And why do Muslims never mention that so many of the “facts”
in the Quran are in accordance with Greek and Persian (wrong) science at that time?
**002 96/11: “- – – if he (a man*) is on (the road of) Guidance?” Is there guidance in a book
with more than 1700 points with mistaken facts, at least 200 likely mistaken facts, more than
100 linguistic mistakes in the Arab edition according to linguists, lots of loose statements and
lots of invalid “signs” and “proofs” – the hallmark of cheaters and deceivers? Not to mention
200+ contradictions, 100+ abrogations and 400+ cases of unclear language in the Quran – the
claimed lack of which is Islam’s only strongly claimed (but never proved) proof for divine
origin of the book!! – No; no real guidance. No evidence and no good guidance.
003 96/13: “- – – if he (a man*) denies (Truth (the Quran*)) – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.
SURAH 97 – 98 – 99 – 100:
001 98/1a: “Those (non-Muslims*) who reject (Truth (the Quran*)) – – -”. See 40/75 and
41/12.
002 98/1b: “- – – Clear Evidence – – -”. This means the Quran: See 96/11, 40/75 and 41/12.
493
003 98/4: “- – – Clear Evidence – – -”. This means the Quran: See 96/11, 40/75 and 41/12.
004 98/6: “ Those who reject (Truth (the Quran*)) – – -.” With all that is wrong in the Quran,
the book at best is partly the truth.
Surah 96 – 100: At least 7 mistakes.
SURAH 101 – 102 – 103:
001 103/3: “- – – teaching of the Truth – – -”. See 40/75 and 41/12 – – – and others.
SURAH 104 – 105:
001 105/3+4: “- – – Han (Allah*) sent against them Flights of Birds, Striking them with stones
of baked clay.” This refers to an attack from Abyssinia in 570 AD. The vice king Abrhah or
Abrah, lost much of his army because of a virulent illness – perhaps smallpox – and had to
return home without attacking Mecca. The troops were NOT killed by stones from birds.
Muslim scholars often agree this is unlikely, but sometimes try to “explain” the clear text and
the as clear mistake away by some linguistic gymnastics that includes that the Arab word for
stone and the one for writings are not dissimilar, and if they think that these words have been
mixed up (in a holy book sent down by Allah, and without mistakes), and then say the
meaning is metaphorical (in a book the Allah says shall be understood as it is written), it may
not mean stones, but hard physical strikes. Muslims frequently have to use far out
“explanations” like this to try to camouflage mistakes. But if there is a linguistic mistake here,
according to Muslims – how many more linguistic mistakes are there in the Quran?
SURAH 106 through 114:
00a 112/3: “He (Allah*) begetteth not – – -.” Well, if Allah should happen to be the same god
as Yahweh all the same, Jesus many times called him “father” and many times said he was the
son of Yahweh – and lots/most of those times it is clear it was meant in the real meaning. In
the NT it is said at least 163 times that Yahweh was father of Jesus, and at least 66 times that
Jesus was the son of Yahweh. It is said nothing about how the relationship started. If true,
there are 3 possibilities:
1. The age-old and mostly forgotten female
counterpart of Yahweh in the very distant past
of the Hebrew pre-history, may be true. Then
the “Amat” of Yahweh may be the mother of
Jesus.
2. Yahweh may have created him. As it is said
in both the Bible and even more in the Quran,
the god only could say “be” and it was. May
be the god said “be” and Jesus was.
3. Also Jesus may have existed since eternity.
Surah 101 – 114: At least 2 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.
Total for all the Quran: At least 1776 mistakes + 213 likely mistakes.
494
In reality there are more. It is our educated guess that a real in depth analyses will end at
2ooo+ points with mistaken facts, as there are points we have skipped because the proofs
were more complicated, there are the likely mistakes – a lot of them will turn out to be real
mistakes – there are the borderline cases we have skipped because we were not sure, and not
least: We hardly have seen all the mistakes.
In addition there are the other mistakes, errors and wrongs.
In this edition (2009) we have most of the mistaken facts. There are three categories that are
missing:
1. Mistaken facts we have overlooked – there
are sure to be some.
2. Mistakes that needs much explaining – we
have omitted them if they were minor ones.
3. All the border-line suspect points we have
omitted – at least some of them in reality are
mistakes. This means there in reality are more
that can be listed – especially likely mistakes.
F. ex. all the times the Quran uses the name
Allah for the god of the old Israel and all the
times it claims Muhammad was the
representative of a god – can an omniscient
god have sent a representative that presented
so many errors to his followers ?
This 2009 edition is planned to be the final one as for mistaken facts – it is far more than
enough to prove 100% and more that something is seriously wrong with Muhammad,
with the Quran, and with Islam. We may add some more mistakes from grammar,
orthography, etc., and some more contradictions, abrogations, etc., but for mistaken facts we
think this is enough. Though if we are made aware of mistakes we have overlooked, they will
be added.
If we have made mistakes – but real mistakes and not f. ex. just divergences with the Bible – we have
not found, please inform us by Internet and our answering box. We will add them later.
PART II, CHAPTER 1, Subchapter 4, Section 9 (= II-1-4-9)
MISTAKES AND ERRORS – MISTAKEN FACTS – IN THE QURAN, THE
HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. THE
“COMPLETE” LIST – THE “ENCYCLOPAEDIA” – BASED ON SURAH
AND VERSE NUMBER
(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 – 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS,
CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT
SOMETHING IS WRONG – NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)
495
For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3,
Sections 1 through 16.
INEVITABLE CONCLUTIONS FROM
FACT MISTAKES AND ERRORS IN THE
QURAN – THE HOLY BOOK OF
MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND
ALLAH
There are some inevitable conclusions you arrive at when you read the Quran without
religious blindness, but with some knowledge about different things relevant to the texts – and
use your intelligence and knowledge, not just blind belief – and with one fact in mind: THAT
AN OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES NO MISTAKES, SO THE EXISTENCE OF ONE
SINGLE MISTAKE IS A WARNING THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG, AND THE
EXISTENCE OF MORE THAN A VERY FEW IS A 100% PROOF FOR THINGS
BEING SERIOUSLY WRONG. Well, actually even one mistake is a 100% such proof.
1. There are LOTS of mistaken facts – and other
mistakes – in the Quran. No god would say or
dictate anything he knew was wrong – he had
to know that sooner or later it would be
discovered and discredit him. He would omit
the mistakes and use other arguments instead
– or even better: He would tell what was
correct and over time have his existence
proved. No omniscient god made or sent
down the Quran.
2. To claim like the Quran does that an
omniscient god reveres a book full of
mistaken facts and other mistakes, plus lots of
contradictions, logically invalid “signs” –
Quran-speak for “indication” or “proof” – and
as invalid (some of them even wrong)
“proofs”, etc., etc. is both an insult and heresy
towards the god. It also tells volumes and
miles about naivety and about how difficult it
may be to re-evaluate what you came to
believe as a child (or later) just because your
forfathers or parents or teachers or
priests/mullahs/imams told you so – because
that is the only reason for Muslims’ belief.
And also how difficult it is to re-evaluate
fundamental ideas and prinsiples you have
built your life and your society has built its
culture on – it takes a lot even to ask the
496
question: May it be wrong? INEVITABLE
CONCLUSION: THE QURAN IS NOT
WRITTEN BY AN OMNISCIENT
GOD.An impertinent pertinent comment:
Mistaken facts are not the hallmark of an
omniscient god, but of cheats, swindlers
and deceivers.
3. In the book “The Message of the Quran”,
certified by Al-Azhar Al-Sharif Islamic
Research Academy in Cairo (one of the 2-3
top universities in the Muslim world on such
subjects) in a letter dated 27. Dec. 1998, it is
admitted rather reluctantly that there are no
proofs for Allah, and that it is not possible to
prove him. An additonal point here is that if
there are no ptoof for Allah and impossible to
ptove him, automatically there also is no
proof for, and impossible to prove
Muhammad’s claimed connection to Allah.
4. There are lots and lots of loose statements just
taken out of nowhere or building on not
proven statements, not proven facts or even
on mistaken facts. A god could have meant
some of this just as information – though he in
case had omitted wrong facts as sources, and
he had had to include at least some proofs.
But use of loose statements is a technique
used by cheats and deceivers. The point is
suspicious, though seen alone not enough
for inevitable conclusions if one omit the
wrong facts. But when seen together with
the other points here it is different: No
omniscient god made this book.
5. There are lots of “signs” used for indications
of Allah in the Quran – AND NOT ONE
SINGLE OF THEM IS SCIENTIFICALLY
OR LOGICALLY VALID because not one of
them is based on proven facts stating that it
really is Allah that caused the sign – words are
cheap, but only real proofs are reliable. And
remember: A proof is “one or more proven
facts that can give only one conclution”
(Islam normally uses not proven claims, etc.,
instead of proven facts as basis for
conclutions). Some of the signs even are
based on wrong statements. No god would do
this – for the same reasons as in above. Even
worse: The use of made up or even wrong
arguments, are hallmarks of cheats and
deceivers. INEVITABLE CONCLUSION:
497
THE QURAN IS NOT MADE BY AN
OMNISCIENT GOD.
6. Even more grave: There are lots of “proofs”
for Allah in the Quran – AND NOT ONE
SINGLE OF THEM IS SCIENTIFICALLY
OR LOGICALLY VALID for the same
reason as above. (There are a few possible
exceptions taken from the Bible, but they in
case point to Yahweh, not to Allah (see #7).
Also – and to a higher degree – this is a
hallmark of cheats and deceivers. NO god
would ever use it. INEVITABLE
CONCLUSION: THE QURAN IS NOT
MADE BY AN OMNISCIENT GOD.
7. The Quran often uses naturally occurring
phenomena as indications or proofs for Allah,
without the slightest proof for that Allah
really is behind it. These statements are
totally without value because:
1. Any priest in any religion can say just
the same about his god(s) – words are
that cheap.
2. No god would use such phenomena as
proofs without further explanation,
because he knew they by themselves
were invalid proofs, and even more so
because he knew man sooner would
find out how things work, and then he
would come under suspicion because
he used invalid proofs – the hallmark
of cheaters and deceivers.
INEVITABLE CONCLUSION:
THE QURAN IS NOT MADE BY
AN OMNISCIENT GOD.
8. Many of the mistakes in the Quran are in
accordance with what one believed at that
time were the truths in what we now call the
Middle East – based mostly on Greek, Persian
and some Indian science. Any god would
have known it was wrong, but Muhammad
and his contemporaries not. LOGICAL AND
INEVITABLE CONCLUSION: THE
QURAN IS NOT MADE BY A GOD, BUT
BY SOMEONE LIVING AT THE TIME
OF MUHAMMAD – MOST LIKELY BY
MOHAMMAD HIMSELF.
9. There are so many and so fundamental
differences between especially the New
Testament (= Christians) and the Quran, that
it is impossible that both religions can have
498
the same god unless he is schizophrenic – and
neither Muslims, nor Jews nor Christians
accept that. INEVITABLE CONCLUSION:
IF THE GOD IS NOT MENTALLY ILL –
SCHIZOPHRENIC – ALLAH AND
GOD/YAHWEH IS NOT THE SAME
GOD.
10. We may add that the chapters about
incitements to war, about war (and especially
since more or less everything is deemed to be
a jihad), about the chapters about slavery and
about human relationship except among
Muslim men, and about some aspects with
Islamic law (f. ex. a man is wrong for Allah if
he correctly tells that a woman has behaved
indecently, but do not have 4 witnesses, or
that a woman is to be strictly punished for
indecency if she is raped, but unable to
produce 4 male witnesses to the very act – not
to mention that steling/robbint, raping,
suppression, killing, etc. in the name of Allah
is “lawful and good”) give another 100%
conclusion which is another INEVITABLE
CONCLUSION: IF THERE WAS A
“HIGHER POWER” INVOLVED IN THE
MAKING OF THE QURAN, IT WAS
NOT A BENEVOLENT GOD.
Islam has a tendency to use half-truths and cherry picking when they argue. To have the best
chance of finding a true answer, you always have to use all the real facts you know, and then
deduce using strict and correct logic. Islam far from always does that. To use the very wrong
statements of the 7 material heavens, as an example:
This Islam tries to explain f. ex. that in old Arab “7” often meant “a number of”. This may or
may not be true, but no matter it explains nothing away, as “a number of heavens” is as bad as
“seven heavens”. And they often try to explain that Muhammad in reality meant the universe
and all then galaxies, etc. – things the Quran in never mentions and never had an idea about.
And they try to explain that the Quran in reality talks about 7 layers in the atmosphere,
ionosphere and magnetosphere – things further away from Muhammad’s brain than something
outside the reach of a space telescope. An acquaintance of mine really got a scolding from an
angry Muslim because he refused to believe that Muhammad really was way ahead of science
when he talked about 7 heavens meaning 7 layers in the atmosphere that now science finally
had discovered – “everything fit” (no matter if the stars were not fixed to the lowest of those
layers like the Quran says, the frying of Eart that would result from such neighbourhood, etc.)
In this discussion, Islam carefully omits to mention:
1. Surah 17 – The Night Journey – where
Muhammad tells he is a tourist travelling
through the 7 heavens. This cannot be
499
mentioned in this connection, because it
confirms the mistake.
2. That the stars are fastened to the lowest of the
heavens. This also cannot be mentioned, if
there shall be a chance for making anyone
except the most stupid or religiously blind
believe it.
3. Not one single place in all our reading have
we met a Muslim/Islam mentioning the very
well known fact that in Greek and Persian and
as far as we know also Indian astronomy there
were 7 heavens, and the Arabs got their
astronomy from there – a very easy and 100%
sure explanation for the 7 heavens in the
Quran. But this can not be mentioned,
because no god – omniscient or not – would
use wrong astronomy from Earth and from
one specifik periode of time on Earth in his
statements, “signs” and “proofs”.
This kind of intellectual dishonesty makes a great and negative impression on educated
readers trying to keep an open mind – the only thing such a reader can conclude with, is that
Muslims are so dishonest or under such influence from wishful thinking or religious blindness
– or leaders coldly going for power – that it is not possible to believe anything at all of what
they tell, unless you have good proofs from the outside. – or that they simply are that naïve,
uneducated or religiously blind. But: Repeating and repeating and repeating that everything in
the Quran is true, may make many naive and not quite so naïve persons believe it is so, too.
Remember Joseph Goebbels: “If you repeat a lie often enough, people start believing it is the
truth”.
The psychological difficulties for Muslims (and others) of checking and testing and changing
one’s deepest beliefs, are easy to understand. But what is the logic in: Better to believe
blindly in the religion of our forefathers which no-one ever has controlled whether is
right or wrong. Better – no matter what the facts say – than to may be find out it really is
wrong and then in no way can lead to a paradise. This especially if there somewhere
exists a true religion you have been prohibitted to look for, and then you wake up the
wrong place in a possible (?) next life.
Our personal intellectual, non-religious mind just wonder: Is it really better not to ask
questions and believe blindly in the god of ones fathers, like Muslims do – and only find
out if it is true or not in a possible next life?.
And if the Quran – and Islam – is made up (f. ex. by a Muhammad wanting followers and
power like so many new religious leaders (it is clear he liked power and women – and
money for bribes/”gifts”) and/or by a Muhammad perhaps partly ruled by an illness
(like f. ex. TLE), where does that leave ALL Muslims? – especially if there should
happen to be another, true religion that Islam hinders its believers to find?
PART II, CHAPTER 2 (= II-2-0-0)
500
OTHER TYPES OF MISTAKES AND ERRORS IN THE QURAN, THE
HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. THE
“COMPLETE” LIST – THE “ENCYCLOPAEDIA” – BASED ON SURAH
AND VERSE NUMBER
(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 – 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS,
CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT
SOMETHING IS WRONG – NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)
For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3,
Sections 1 through 16.
GRAMMATICAL MISTAKES AND
ERRORS IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS,
ISLAM, AND ALLAH
Grammatical mistakes are at least as bad as foreign words in the book, as they more clearly
are mistakes, but see the introduction to the chapter about foreign words in the Quran (chapter
II/3).The examples below are from P. Rafiqul-Haqq and P. Newton: “The Quran:
Grammatical Errors” (A book not liked by Muslims, just because it documents mistakes in the
Quran, but the book has stood against intense critic – and slander). But beware that we also
have taken some samples from Internet, and therefore they should be used with care – and if
you find mistakes, please inform us.
There are Muslims saying there cannot be grametical errors in the Quran, because the Arab
grammar was developed during the work with the Quran (NB: Not around 650 AD, but during
the periode of forming the book – i. e. during the some 250 years up to c. 900 AD when the
Quran after much polishing finally had gotten something like the form it has today). That is
likely to be true – but a grammar is made from a language, not from a single book. Plus: Even
if they made grammatical rules, that does not mean they were able to follow them always.
Also beware that the words are transcribed from Arab letters – different transcribers may
transcribe the sounds a little different – a normal occurrence when something is transcribed
from a language with another alphabet.
1. 2/177: aaman should be tu’minuu.
2. 2/177: aata should be tu’tuu (2 times).
3. 2/177: aqaama should be tuqimuu.
4. 2/177: sasbriina should be saabiruuna
(because its position in the sentence – and
plural should be masculine). 5 mistakes in
one verse.
5. 3/59: Kun feekunu should be Kun fekaana.
501
6. 4/162: mukiimiin (feminine plural) should be
mukiimuun (masculine plural – see 7/160).
7. 5/69: Saabbi’uuna should be Sabi’iina. (=
Sabians).
8. 7/56: qaribun should be qariba.
9. 7/160: asbatan (feminine plural) should be
sebtan (masculine – human plurals are male in
Arab).
10. 20/63: haazaani should be haazayn.
11. 21/3: ‘asarru should be ‘assarra.
12. 22/19: ‘ikhtasamuu should be ‘ikhtasamaa.
13. 41/11: at’e’een should be at’e’atain.
14. 49/9: ‘eq-tatalu should be ‘eqtatalata.
15. 63/10: ‘akun should be ‘akuuna.
16. 63/20: hadhane (nominative) should be
hadhayne (accusative).
17. 91/5: ma should be man.
There are more but this should show that there are grammatical mistakes (mostly declinations)
in the Quran – many or few does not matter too much, as a god makes no mistakes at all.
According to Ali Dashti: “Twenty-Three Years: A study of the Prophetic Career of
Muhammad” there are more than 100 divergences in the Quran from normal Arab linguistic
rules and structures.
A clear conclusion: Correct and good Arab language in the Quran cannot be used as a
proof for that Allah sent down the Quran, as there are numerous mistakes – on the
contrary: The mistakes may prove that no god was involved.
PART II, CHAPTER 3 (= II-3-0-0)
OTHER TYPES OF MISTAKES AND ERRORS IN THE QURAN, THE
HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH.
(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 – 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS,
CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT
SOMETHING IS WRONG – NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)
For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3,
Sections 1 through 16.
NON-ARAB WORDS IN THE QURAN –
THE HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD,
MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH
502
Comments in this book numbered by 3 numbers (included 00 or 0) a few places followed by
one small letter = clear cases. Comments numbered by 00 or 0 followed by 1, 2 or 3 letters
(big or small) = likely cases.
The Quran very strongly stresses that it is written in pure and correct Arabic. Normally some
non-Arabic words should not mean very much, but as both the Quran, Islam and Muslims
stress the pure and correct language as a “sign”/”proof” for that the book is made by Allah, it
becomes serious. An omniscient god using the purity of the language as a proof for his
authorship, would not use one single non-Arabic word – this even more so as in most cases
corresponding Arab words did exist. One Muslim “explanation” (set forth by the in philology
educated scholar Muslim Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, dead 1505 AD) is that Arabs have used the
words so much, that they have made them Arab. Like many Muslim “explanations”
concerning mistakes in the Quran, it is very ad hoc, and strongly marked by the intense
necessity to find some explanation, and by the fact that this was the only one possible one –
good or not they have to use it. The language – and the “explanation” – is not pure enough and
good enough to prove Allah’s existence, his connection to Muhammad, or Allah’s authorship.
Pure Arab also is the language spoken in Heaven according to some Islamic literature (and
some Muslim sects – notably the Amaddijjas – have “proved” it also is the original language
on Earth, believe it or not.)
12/2: “We (Allah*) have sent it down as an Arabic Quran – – -.”
13/37: “Thus heve We (Allah*) revealed it (the Quran*) to be a judgement of authority in
Arabic.”
16/103: “’It is a man that teaches him (Muhammad*)’. (But*) The tongue of him they point to
(a learned foreigner*) is notably foreign, while this is Arabic, pure and clear”. The proof is
invalid (even if the teacher was a foreigner, Muhammad’s retelling would depend on
Muhammad’s choice of words), also because the language is not “pure and clean”.
41/44: “Unfortunately for their (non-Muslims*) postulate (that Muhammad had a foreign
teacher*), any possible human teacher they could think of would be poor in Arabic speech if
they had all the knowledge that the Quran reveals of previous revelations (the Bible*). Apart
from that, even the most eloquent Arab could not, and cannot, produce anything with the
eloquence, width, and depth of Quranic teaching, as if evident from every verse of the book
(the Quran*)”.
Well, the language proves nothing here, too, as it is not “pure and clean Arab” and as it in
case was Muhammad’s choise of words that were spread, not the possible teacher’s. (Also;
really the Quran does not show much knowledge about the Bible, but more about the nonBiblical legends and tales that were rife and popular in Arabia – and beyond – at the time of
Muhammad. A teacher that really knew the Bible, had told the Quran very differently. The
verse proves nothing.)
It is here also worth remembering:
1. The old Arab alphabet only had the
consonants – it even today is unclear what is
the real meaning of many sentences.
503
2. The old Arab alphabet did not have the points
(“diacritical marks”) used later to mark
different letters.
3. The old Arab alphabet did not have marks
like full stop or comma – even though many a
Muslim today claims that the Hafs version of
the Quran he is reading – or may be the
Warsh version if he is from Africa – is an
exact copy of Muhammad’s words “down to
the last comma”.
4. The written Arab language and alphabet was
not perfected until ca. 900 AD – perfect
writing was impossible around 650 AD when
the official Quran was made.
But all the same the use of imported words in a book trying to use perfect Arab language as a
proof for divine origin, tells that it is not made by an omniscient god – he had not made such
mistakes.
We stress that the following samples partly are taken from Internet, as our Arab is not up to
that standard. Therefore it must be used carefully, and if you find mistakes, please inform us.
It only is meant as a taste – according to experts there are a lot more:
1. Acadian:
2. Adam = man or mankind. The correct Arab
word: Basharan or insane.
3. Eden = garden. The correct Arab word: Janna.
4. Aramaic:
5. Qiyama = resurrection.
6. Assyrian:
7. Abraham/Ibrahim – a name. The correct Arab
equivalent: Abu Raheem.
8. Egyptian:
9. Pharaoh = king or potentate (also a title).
Used 84 times in the Quran.
10. Ethiopic:
11. Malak = angel (2/33)
12. Greek:
13. Iblis – corruption of the Greek word diabolos
= devil.
14. Injil – corruption of the Greek word
eua(n)ggelion = Gospel. Correct.
15. Hebrew:
16. Ahbar = teacher.
17. Darasa = to find the deepest meanings of the
scriptures by exact and thorough studies.
18. Furquan (also used in Syriac, pwrqn) = to
make free, salvation.
504
19. Issa or Isa = Esau (brother of the patriarch
Jacob). The Quran says it means Jesus.
Correct Arab for Jesus: Yeshuwa.
20. Jahannam (Gehinnom or Gehenna) =
originally the valley of Hennom or Hinnom
near Jerusalem, intensely used for Pagan
(Baal) sacrifices to fire, and it therefore later
gave the name to Hell.
21. Jannatu Adn = paradise, Garden of Eden
(today reckoned by science to have been in
south Iraq – if it ever existed).
22. Malakut = reign, the country of Allah/God.
NB: No original Arab word ends with -ut.
23. Masani = repetition.
24. Maun = to find sanctuary.
25. Rabbani = teacher.
26. Sabt = day of rest (Sabbath).
27. Sakinat = the presence of Allah/God.
28. Tabut = ark.
29. Taghut = mistake.
30. orah (Taurat) = Jewish holy scriptures, the
Torah.
31. Tufan = deluge
32. There also are Hebrew words like; heber,
sakinah, maoon, turat, jehannim.
33. Persian:
34. Firdaus = the highest or 7. Heaven. Correct
Arab: Jannah.
35. Haroot or Harut = Persian name for angel.
Also see “Maroot”.
36. Hoor = disciple. Correct Arab: Tilmeeth.
37. Jinn = good or bad demon. Correct Arab:
Ruh.
38. Maroot or Marut = Persian name for angel.
May in reality be the Hindu god of the wind.
39. Sirat = path. Correct Arab: Altareeq.
40. Syriac (liturgical language used in Eastern
Christian churches – derived from Aramaic).
41. 2/50 furqaan (original Hebrew?) – from
pwrqn, Syriac = Salvation.
42. 52/29 kaahin – from khn, Syriac = “priest” –
meaning a pagan soothsayer or diviner
(69/47).
43. 3/45 mashiih = “the Christ”.
44. 57/12 muhaymin – from mhymn’, Syriac =
“the faithful”.
45. 21/87 nuun – (title used for Jonah (Yunus)),
from nwn, Syriac =“fish”.
46. 2/85 qiaama – from qymt, Syriac =
“resurrection“. (also 2/113, numerous times).
505
47. 5/85 qissiis – from qshysh, Syriac =
“Christian priest”.
48. 4/85 Qur’an – from qyrn, Syriac = “scriptural
lesson” or “reading”. (also MANY other
places).
49. 3/73 rabbinic – from rbn, Syriac = “perceptor,
doctor.” (also 5/48, 5/68).
50. 16/102 ruuh al-qudus, from rwh.qwdsh’,
Syriac = “Holy Spirit”.
51. 20/80 tuur – from t.wr’, Syriac = “mountain”.
There also are Syriac words like; taboot, tag hoot, zakat, malakout.
POST SCRIPTUM FOR CHAPTER II/3:
There are more as said above – and also from other countries. Al Suyuti himself lists 107
foreign words in the Quran. An expert like Arthur Jeffery says some 275 words.
It must be a let down that even the word “Qur’an” is not an Arab word, but from Syriac.
A clear conclusion: A clear and pure Arab language in the book cannot be used as a
proof for that Allah sent down the Quran (– this in spite of that some Muslims tell that
Arab is the language that is used in Heaven). On the contrary: The mistakes may
indicate the opposite.
PART II, CHAPTER 4 (= II-4-0-0)
OTHER TYPES OF MISTAKES AND ERRORS IN THE QURAN, THE
HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH.
(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 – 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS,
CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY
BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT
SOMETHING IS WRONG – NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)
For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3,
Sections 1 through 16.
ANIMISM AND ANTHROPOMORPHISM
IN THE QURAN – THE HOLY BOOK OF
MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND
ALLAH
(ANIMISM = GIVINGING DEAD MATTER AND PLANTS ANIMAL-LIKE PROPRTIES. ANTHROPOMORPHISM = GIVING DEAD
MATTER, PLANTS OR ANIMALS HUMAN-LIKE PROPERTIES – OFTEN ONLY THE SPIRITUAL PROPERTIES. BOTH ARE
TYPICAL FOR PRIMITIVE AND/OR PAGAN RELIgion

505